• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于严重急性下消化道出血患者风险分层的临床预测模型。

A clinical predictive model for risk stratification of patients with severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Rd, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.

Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Nov 22;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00402-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13017-021-00402-y
PMID:34809648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8607718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common presentation of surgical admissions, imposing a significant burden on healthcare costs and resources. There is a paucity of standardised clinical predictive tools available for the initial assessment and risk stratification of patients with LGIB. We propose a simple clinical scoring model to prognosticate patients at risk of severe LGIB and an algorithm to guide management of such patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, identifying consecutive patients admitted to our institution for LGIB over a 1-year period. Baseline demographics, clinical parameters at initial presentation and treatment interventions were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors predictive of severe LGIB. A clinical management algorithm was developed to discriminate between patients requiring admission, and to guide endoscopic, angiographic and/or surgical intervention.

RESULTS

226/649 (34.8%) patients had severe LGIB. Six variables were entered into a clinical predictive model for risk stratification of LGIB: Tachycardia (HR ≥ 100), hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg), anaemia (Hb < 9 g/dL), metabolic acidosis, use of antiplatelet/anticoagulants, and active per-rectal bleeding. The optimum cut-off score of ≥ 1 had a sensitivity of 91.9%, specificity of 39.8%, and positive and negative predictive Values of 45% and 90.2%, respectively, for predicting severe LGIB. The area under curve (AUC) was 0.77.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and management of severe LGIB remains a challenge for the acute care surgeon. The predictive model described comprises objective clinical parameters routinely obtained at initial triage to guide risk stratification, disposition and inpatient management of patients.

摘要

背景

下消化道出血(LGIB)是外科住院患者的常见表现,给医疗保健成本和资源带来了巨大负担。目前缺乏用于 LGIB 患者初始评估和风险分层的标准化临床预测工具。我们提出了一种简单的临床评分模型,以预测有发生严重 LGIB 风险的患者,并提出了一种指导此类患者管理的算法。

方法

进行了一项回顾性队列研究,确定了在我院接受 LGIB 治疗的连续患者在一年内。记录了基线人口统计学资料、初始表现时的临床参数和治疗干预措施。进行多变量逻辑回归以确定预测严重 LGIB 的因素。开发了一种临床管理算法,以区分需要住院治疗的患者,并指导内镜、血管造影和/或手术干预。

结果

226/649(34.8%)患者有严重 LGIB。有 6 个变量被纳入 LGIB 风险分层的临床预测模型:心动过速(HR≥100)、低血压(SBP<90mmHg)、贫血(Hb<9g/dL)、代谢性酸中毒、使用抗血小板/抗凝剂和直肠出血活跃。临界值≥1 的最佳得分对预测严重 LGIB 的敏感性为 91.9%、特异性为 39.8%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为 45%和 90.2%。曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.77。

结论

急性护理外科医生在早期诊断和治疗严重 LGIB 方面仍面临挑战。所描述的预测模型包括在初始分诊时常规获得的客观临床参数,以指导风险分层、患者的处置和住院管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c4/8607718/184dc09167c2/13017_2021_402_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c4/8607718/9a1e774606c8/13017_2021_402_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c4/8607718/184dc09167c2/13017_2021_402_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c4/8607718/9a1e774606c8/13017_2021_402_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c4/8607718/184dc09167c2/13017_2021_402_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A clinical predictive model for risk stratification of patients with severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.一种用于严重急性下消化道出血患者风险分层的临床预测模型。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Nov 22;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00402-y.
2
Development and Validation of a Risk Scoring System for Severe Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.严重急性下消化道出血风险评分系统的建立与验证。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;14(11):1562-1570.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.042. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
3
Comparison of clinical prediction tools and identification of risk factors for adverse outcomes in acute lower GI bleeding.比较急性下消化道出血不良结局的临床预测工具,并确定其危险因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):1005-1013.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
Accurate triage of lower gastrointestinal bleed (LGIB) - A cohort study.准确分诊下消化道出血(LGIB)- 一项队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jan;25:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
5
A multicentre development and validation study of a novel lower gastrointestinal bleeding score-The Birmingham Score.一项新型下消化道出血评分-伯明翰评分的多中心研发和验证研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Feb;35(2):285-293. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03459-z. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
External validation of the NOBLADS score, a risk scoring system for severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.NOBLADS 评分的外部验证,一种用于严重急性下消化道出血的风险评分系统。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0196514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196514. eCollection 2018.
7
Outcome predictors in acute surgical admissions for lower gastrointestinal bleeding.急性下消化道出血外科住院患者的预后预测因素。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Aug;14(8):1020-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02824.x.
8
Initial management for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.急性下消化道出血的初始处理。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 7;25(1):69-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i1.69.
9
External Validation of the Oakland Score to Assess Safe Hospital Discharge Among Adult Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the US.美国急性下消化道出血成年患者安全出院的 Oakland 评分的外部验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209630. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9630.
10
Management of Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Updated ACG Guideline.急性下消化道出血患者的管理:ACG 指南更新版。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 1;118(2):208-231. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002130. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
External Validation of SHAPE Score: A Score to Predict Low-Risk Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Emergency Department.SHAPE评分的外部验证:一种用于预测急诊科低风险下消化道出血的评分
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2025 Jan 3;2025:5657404. doi: 10.1155/grp/5657404. eCollection 2025.
2
Traumatic bleeding and mortality in mice are intensified by iron deficiency anemia and can be rescued with tranexamic acid.缺铁性贫血会加剧小鼠的创伤性出血和死亡率,而氨甲环酸可以挽救这种情况。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Aug 8;8(6):102543. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102543. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Practice variation in the management of pediatric intussusception: a narrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk stratification in upper and upper and lower GI bleeding: Which scores should we use?上消化道和上下消化道出血的风险分层:我们应该使用哪些评分?
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct-Dec;42-43:101613. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
2
Diagnosis and management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology.急性下消化道出血的诊断和治疗:英国胃肠病学会指南。
Gut. 2019 May;68(5):776-789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317807. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
The Burden of Diverticular Disease and Its Complications: West versus East.
小儿肠套叠治疗的实践差异:叙述性综述。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Nov;183(11):4897-4904. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05759-1. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
4
Single center assessment of the role of Oakland score among patients admitted for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.单中心评估 Oakland 评分在急性下消化道出血患者入院中的作用。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 15;24(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03283-y.
5
A new groin hernia classification with clinical relevance.一种具有临床相关性的新型腹股沟疝分类。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1169-1179. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03000-4. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
6
Safe discharge for patients admitted for lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGITB): derivation and validation of a novel scoring system.下消化道出血(LGITB)住院患者的安全出院:新型评分系统的推导和验证。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02950-w.
7
Expert consensus on blood pressure management in critically ill patients.危重症患者血压管理专家共识
J Intensive Med. 2023 Jul 14;3(3):185-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.06.001. eCollection 2023 Jul 31.
8
Novel risk score for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly patients: a single-centre retrospective study.老年患者急性上消化道出血新型风险评分:一项单中心回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 7;13(6):e072602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072602.
9
Differences in in-hospital outcomes and healthcare utilization for laparoscopic versus open approach for emergency inguinal hernia repair: a nationwide analysis.腹腔镜与开放式急诊腹股沟疝修补术的住院结局和医疗利用差异:全国性分析。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):601-608. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02742-x. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
憩室病及其并发症的负担:西方与东方对比
Inflamm Intest Dis. 2018 Dec;3(2):61-68. doi: 10.1159/000492178. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
4
Initial management for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.急性下消化道出血的初始处理。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 7;25(1):69-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i1.69.
5
Comparison of clinical prediction tools and identification of risk factors for adverse outcomes in acute lower GI bleeding.比较急性下消化道出血不良结局的临床预测工具,并确定其危险因素。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 May;89(5):1005-1013.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.011. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
6
Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Patients Treated With an Intensive Protocol.急性下消化道出血:采用强化方案治疗患者的特征及临床结局
Gastroenterology Res. 2017 Dec;10(6):352-358. doi: 10.14740/gr914w. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
7
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and the Severity Risk of Lower Intestinal Bleeding.双重抗血小板治疗与下消化道出血的严重程度风险
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2017 Jul-Sep;10(3):98-102. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_110_15.
8
Derivation and Internal Validation of a Clinical Prediction Tool for 30-Day Mortality in Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.下消化道出血30天死亡率临床预测工具的推导与内部验证
Am J Med. 2017 May;130(5):601.e1-601.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
9
Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.上消化道出血患者风险评分系统的比较:国际多中心前瞻性研究
BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6432.
10
The Clinical Outcomes of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding Are Not Better than Those of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.下消化道出血的临床结局并不优于上消化道出血。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Oct;31(10):1611-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.10.1611.