Wu Bo-ting, Yao Ding-gen, Rong Rui-ming
Department of Transfusion, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Jun 28;91(24):1691-3.
To evaluate the occurrence and clinical significance of red blood cell (RBC) allo-antibodies among hospitalized patients in China.
The specificity and clinical features of RBC allo-antibodies of hospitalized patients at our hospital from August 2009 to January 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.
Sixty-four (0.17%) RBC allo-antibodies were detected from 37 548 hospitalized patients. The male-to-female ratio was 0.6:1 and the transfused: untransfused ratio 0.9:1. Two patients had experienced episodes of delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR). Their antibody frequencies were as follows: anti-E 53.1% (34/64), anti-D 10.9% (7/64), anti-cE 3.1% (2/64), anti-c 1.6% (1/64), anti-M 14.1% (9/64), anti-Mi(a) 10.9% (7/64), anti-Le(a) 4.7% (3/64), anti-Di(a) 1.6% (1/64). Antibodies to Rh system were more frequent among transfused patients while antibodies to Lewis system had a male predominance (both P < 0.05).
As the most common and clinically significant RBC allo-antibodies, the antibodies to Rh blood group system, especially anti-E, anti-cE and anti-c, are the main cause of DHTR.
评估中国住院患者中红细胞(RBC)同种抗体的发生率及临床意义。
回顾性分析我院2009年8月至2011年1月住院患者RBC同种抗体的特异性及临床特征。
从37548例住院患者中检测到64例(0.17%)RBC同种抗体。男女比例为0.6:1,输血患者与未输血患者比例为0.9:1。2例患者发生了迟发性溶血性输血反应(DHTR)。其抗体频率如下:抗-E 53.1%(34/64),抗-D 10.9%(7/64),抗-cE 3.1%(2/64),抗-c 1.6%(1/64),抗-M 14.1%(9/64),抗-Mi(a) 10.9%(7/64),抗-Le(a) 4.7%(3/64),抗-Di(a) 1.6%(1/64)。Rh系统抗体在输血患者中更为常见,而Lewis系统抗体在男性中占优势(均P < 0.05)。
作为最常见且具有临床意义的RBC同种抗体,Rh血型系统抗体,尤其是抗-E、抗-cE和抗-c,是DHTR的主要原因。