Suppr超能文献

ISHAGE 方案:我们是否正确执行?

ISHAGE protocol: are we doing it correctly?

机构信息

UK NEQAS for Leucocyte Immunophenotyping, Department of Haematology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2QN.

出版信息

Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2012 Jan;82(1):9-17. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20612. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Flow cytometric CD34(+) stem cell enumeration is routinely performed to optimize timing of peripheral blood stem cell collections and assess engraftment capability of the apheresis product. While a number of different flow methodologies have been described, the highly standardized ISHAGE protocol is currently the most widely employed, with 204/255 (81%) international participants in the UK NEQAS CD34(+) stem cell enumeration program indicating their use of this method. Recently, two laboratories were identified as persistent poor performers, a fact attributed to incorrect ISHAGE protocol usage/setup. This prompted UK NEQAS to question whether other laboratories were making similar errors and, if so, how this might affect individual EQA performance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In send out 0801, where two stabilized samples were issued, the EQA center surveyed 255 participants with flow analysis data and subsequent results collected. One hundred and ninety-six laboratories returned results with 103 returning dot plots. Eighty-three out of one hundred and three stated that they used the ISHAGE protocol gating strategy but 43% (36/83) were incorrectly set-up. Analysis of the data showed those incorrectly using single platform ISHAGE gating strategy were twice as likely to fail an EQA exercise compared to those using the protocol correctly. This failure rate increased two fold when incorrect ISHAGE protocol was used in a dual platform setting.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests a widespread fundamental lack of understanding of the ISHAGE protocol and the need to deploy it correctly, potentially having significant clinical implications and highlights the need to monitor participants rigorously in their deployment of the ISHAGE protocol. It is hoped that once these findings have been disseminated, performance can be improved.

摘要

背景

流式细胞术 CD34(+)干细胞计数常用于优化外周血干细胞采集时间,并评估单采产品的植入能力。虽然已经描述了许多不同的流式细胞术方法,但目前应用最广泛的是高度标准化的 ISHAGE 方案,在英国 NEQAS 的 CD34(+)干细胞计数方案中,有 204/255(81%)的国际参与者表示他们使用这种方法。最近,有两个实验室被确定为持续表现不佳的实验室,这一事实归因于不正确的 ISHAGE 方案使用/设置。这促使英国 NEQAS 质疑其他实验室是否也存在类似的错误,如果是这样,这将如何影响个体的 EQA 性能。

方法和结果

在 0801 号外送样本中,我们发放了两个稳定的样本,EQA 中心对 255 个进行流式分析数据和后续结果收集的参与者进行了调查。有 196 个实验室返回了结果,其中 103 个实验室返回了点图。在这 103 个实验室中,有 83 个实验室表示他们使用了 ISHAGE 方案的门控策略,但其中 43%(36/83)的实验室设置不正确。数据分析表明,那些不正确使用单平台 ISHAGE 门控策略的实验室,其 EQA 测试失败的可能性是正确使用该方案的实验室的两倍。当在双平台设置中错误地使用 ISHAGE 方案时,这种失败率增加了两倍。

结论

本研究表明,人们对 ISHAGE 方案普遍缺乏基本的理解,需要正确地实施该方案,这可能具有重要的临床意义,并强调了在实施 ISHAGE 方案时需要严格监测参与者。希望一旦这些发现得到传播,就可以提高性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验