Bagshaw Sean M, Wald Ron
Contrib Nephrol. 2011;174:232-241. doi: 10.1159/000329401. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
Critically ill patients whose course is complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI) often commence renal replacement therapy (RRT). For these patients, initiation of RRT results in a measurable escalation in both the complexity and associated costs of care. While RRT is commonly used in critical care practice, there is uncertainty about the ideal circumstances for the initiation of RRT. This decision is naturally complex and is influenced by numerous factors, including those that are patient-specific, clinician-specific and those related to local logistics. Survey data have clearly shown marked heterogeneity between clinicians and across jurisdictions for the initiation of RRT. As a consequence, analysis of ideal circumstances under which to initiate RRT is challenging and there is currently no broad consensus to guide clinicians on this issue. In this review, we discuss the theoretical benefits and risks of earlier, as compared to later initiation RRT, the accumulated data, and future directions for investigation.
病程并发急性肾损伤(AKI)的重症患者通常会开始接受肾脏替代治疗(RRT)。对于这些患者,开始RRT会导致护理的复杂性和相关成本显著增加。虽然RRT在重症监护实践中普遍使用,但对于开始RRT的理想情况仍存在不确定性。这一决策自然复杂,受到众多因素影响,包括患者特异性因素、临床医生特异性因素以及与当地后勤相关的因素。调查数据清楚地表明,临床医生之间以及不同司法管辖区在开始RRT方面存在显著异质性。因此,分析开始RRT的理想情况具有挑战性,目前在这个问题上尚无广泛共识来指导临床医生。在本综述中,我们讨论了与较晚开始RRT相比,较早开始RRT的理论益处和风险、积累的数据以及未来的研究方向。