Tuebingen Hearing Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Oct;32(8):1379-88. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822f1548.
To assess the suitability of contralateral suppression (CS) of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) for measurement of activity of the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents.
The MOC efferent system has been shown to be involved in sound discrimination, selective attention to tones, sound localization, and protection of the cochlea against noise. A great variety of paradigms for measurement of MOC activity by CS of OAE (MOC reflex [MOCR]), has been described. An issue of this approach is the dependence of the CS values on stimulus parameters, especially when DPOAE are used.
Four different measurement paradigms, which used different combinations of stimulus frequencies and primary tone levels, were applied in 16 human subjects.
Mean absolute values of CS were in the range of 1.2 to 2.6 dB. The use of different stimulus parameters produced not only MOCR values of different size-which was expected-but, in many cases, also different relative classifications of the subjects according to their MOCR strength.
The suppression effects on DPOAE demonstrated in this study reflect MOC activity. However, the new conclusion from our data is that CS of DPOAE measurements, as they were used in this study, may not allow for a consistent quantitative classification of human subjects according to their MOCR strength. This finding concerns interpretation of previous studies using CS of DPOAE and analogous future studies. One future approach may lie in the separation of the DPOAE components to distinguish interference phenomena, which complicate interpretation of CS values.
评估畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)的对侧抑制(CS)用于测量内侧橄榄耳蜗(MOC)传出活动的适宜性。
MOC 传出系统已被证明参与声音辨别、对音调的选择性注意、声音定位以及保护耳蜗免受噪声损伤。已经描述了通过 CS 测量 MOC 活动的各种 OAE(MOC 反射[MOCR])的范式。该方法的一个问题是 CS 值对刺激参数的依赖性,尤其是在使用 DPOAE 时。
在 16 名人类受试者中应用了四种不同的测量范式,这些范式使用了不同的刺激频率和基音水平组合。
CS 的平均绝对值在 1.2 到 2.6dB 之间。使用不同的刺激参数不仅产生了大小不同的 MOCR 值(这是预期的),而且在许多情况下,还根据受试者的 MOCR 强度对其进行了不同的相对分类。
本研究中 DPOAE 上的抑制效应反映了 MOC 活动。然而,我们数据的新结论是,正如本研究中所使用的那样,DPOAE 的 CS 测量可能无法根据受试者的 MOCR 强度对其进行一致的定量分类。这一发现涉及到使用 DPOAE 的 CS 以及类似的未来研究的解释。未来的一种方法可能在于分离 DPOAE 成分,以区分干扰现象,这会使 CS 值的解释复杂化。