da Silva Fernando José Mateus, Pérez Juan Manuel Sánchez, Pulido Juan Antonio Gómez, Rodríguez Miguel A Vega
School of Technology and Management, Computer Science and Communication Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
J Integr Bioinform. 2011 Sep 15;8(3):174. doi: 10.2390/biecoll-jib-2011-174.
Multiple sequence alignment is one of the most recurrent assignments in Bioinformatics. This method allows organizing a set of molecular sequences in order to expose their similarities and their differences. Although exact methods exist for solving this problem, their use is limited by the computing demands which are necessary for exploring such a large and complex search space. Genetic Algorithms are adaptive search methods which perform well in large and complex spaces. Parallel Genetic Algorithms, not only increase the speed up of the search, but also improve its efficiency, presenting results that are better than those provided by the sum of several sequential Genetic Algorithms. Although these methods are often used to optimize a single objective, they can also be used in multidimensional domains, finding all possible tradeoffs among multiple conflicting objectives. Parallel AlineaGA is an Evolutionary Algorithm which uses a Parallel Genetic Algorithm for performing multiple sequence alignment. We now present the Parallel Niche Pareto AlineaGA, a multiobjective version of Parallel AlineaGA. We compare the performance of both versions using eight BAliBASE datasets. We also measure up the quality of the obtained solutions with the ones achieved by T-Coffee and ClustalW2, allowing us to observe that our algorithm reaches for better solutions in the majority of the datasets.
多序列比对是生物信息学中最常见的任务之一。这种方法可以对一组分子序列进行整理,以揭示它们的异同。虽然存在精确的方法来解决这个问题,但由于探索如此庞大和复杂的搜索空间所需的计算要求,其应用受到限制。遗传算法是一种自适应搜索方法,在大型和复杂空间中表现良好。并行遗传算法不仅提高了搜索速度,还提高了效率,其结果比多个顺序遗传算法的总和更好。虽然这些方法通常用于优化单个目标,但它们也可用于多维领域,在多个相互冲突的目标之间找到所有可能的权衡。并行AlineaGA是一种进化算法,它使用并行遗传算法进行多序列比对。我们现在展示并行小生境帕累托AlineaGA,它是并行AlineaGA的多目标版本。我们使用八个BAliBASE数据集比较了两个版本的性能。我们还将获得的解决方案的质量与T-Coffee和ClustalW2的解决方案进行了比较,从而使我们能够观察到我们的算法在大多数数据集中都能找到更好的解决方案。