University of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Res Nurs Health. 2011 Dec;34(6):468-82. doi: 10.1002/nur.20460. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
The effect of maternal attitudes and limit-setting strategies on children's self-regulation (measured as committed compliance) was compared in 151 African-American (AA) and 108 European-American (EA) mothers and their 3-year-old children. There were no ethnic differences in children's compliance, however ethnicity moderated the relationship between maternal authoritarian attitudes and children's compliance. Higher authoritarian attitudes predicted less children's compliance in the EA sample, but greater compliance in the AA sample. Observational limit-setting data revealed that in both ethnic groups, maternal authoritarian attitudes influenced children's self-regulation through maternal use of lower-power (gentle) verbal strategies, fewer physical strategies, and judicious use of higher-power verbal strategies. The findings indicate that the meaning and purpose of authoritarian attitudes varies across these mothers' socio-cultural contexts.
本研究比较了 151 名非裔美国(AA)和 108 名欧裔美国(EA)母亲及其 3 岁孩子的母亲态度和限制设定策略对儿童自我调节(以承诺性遵从为衡量标准)的影响。研究发现,在儿童的遵从性方面,两个种族群体之间没有差异,然而,种族因素调节了母亲专制态度与儿童遵从性之间的关系。在 EA 样本中,较高的专制态度预测了儿童的遵从性较低,而在 AA 样本中,较高的专制态度预测了儿童的遵从性较高。观察性的限制设定数据表明,在两个种族群体中,母亲的专制态度通过母亲使用低权力(温和)语言策略、较少的身体策略以及明智地使用高权力语言策略,影响了儿童的自我调节。研究结果表明,专制态度的意义和目的在这些母亲的社会文化背景中是不同的。