Three-year outcome of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in coronary bifurcation lesions: the provisional side branch stenting approach versus the elective two-stent approach.

AIMS

To explore optimal management strategies for bifurcation lesions with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Among 12,824 patients enrolled in the j-Cypher Registry, we identified 2,122 patients with 2,250 non-left main bifurcation lesions (average age: 69 years; diabetes: 39%; acute coronary syndrome: 24%; lesion length ≥30 mm: 17%; true bifurcation: 53%) treated exclusively with SES. The majority of lesions (1,978 lesions, 88%) were treated by provisional side branch stenting approach with a 4.5% crossover rate, while the elective two-stent approach (stenting both main and side branches) was adopted in 272 lesions. The 3-year incidence of target-lesion revascularisation (TLR) was significantly higher in the elective two-stent group than in the provisional group (18.5% vs. 9.8%, p<0.0001). The incidence of definite stent thrombosis was not different between the two groups (1.3% vs. 0.61%, p=0.21). Among 1,871 lesions with main branch stenting alone, final kissing balloon dilatation (FKB) was performed in 938 lesions (50%). The incidence of TLR was not different between the two groups with or without FKB (9.9% vs. 9.2%, p=0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

The provisional approach provided a good long-term outcome in the majority of lesions with low crossover rate to the two-stent approach. Lesions treated with FKB had similar TLR outcome to those without FKB after main branch stenting alone.