University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Dec;54(6):1597-608. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0213). Epub 2011 Sep 19.
This study investigated the psychometric properties of 2 oral language measures that are commonly used for diagnostic purposes with school-age children who have language impairments.
Two hundred sixteen children with specific language impairment were assessed with the Test of Language Development-Primary, Third Edition (TOLD-P:3; Newcomer & Hammill, 1997) and the Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL; Carrow-Woolfolk, 1999) within a 3-month period. The concurrent and construct validities of these 2 published tests were explored through correlation analysis and principle-component factor analysis.
The TOLD-P:3 Spoken Language Quotient and CASL Core Composite scores were found to have an intertest correlation value of r = .596 within this sample, and a paired samples t test revealed a statistically significant difference between these scores. Principle-component factor analyses revealed a 2-factor structure solution for the TOLD-P:3, whereas data from the CASL supported a single-factor model.
Analyses of assessment measure performance data from a sample of school-age children with specific language impairment revealed concurrent validity values and construct validity patterns that differed from those found in the norming samples as cited in examiner manuals. Implications for practice patterns and future research are discussed.
本研究旨在调查两种常用于语言障碍儿童诊断的口语语言测量工具的心理计量学特性。
在 3 个月的时间内,对 216 名特定语言障碍儿童进行了语言发展测试-第三版(TOLD-P:3;Newcomer & Hammill,1997)和口语语言综合评估(CASL;Carrow-Woolfolk,1999)的评估。通过相关分析和主成分因子分析探讨了这两种已发表测试的同时效和构念效度。
在该样本中,TOLD-P:3 口语语言商数和 CASL 核心综合分数的测试间相关系数为 r =.596,配对样本 t 检验显示这些分数之间存在统计学显著差异。主成分因子分析显示 TOLD-P:3 存在 2 因素结构解决方案,而 CASL 的数据支持单因素模型。
对特定语言障碍学龄儿童样本的评估测量表现数据进行的分析显示,与测试手册中引用的常模样本相比,同时效值和构念效度模式存在差异。讨论了对实践模式和未来研究的影响。