Suppr超能文献

特定语言障碍学龄儿童口语语言测量的同时效度和构念效度。

Concurrent and construct validity of oral language measures with school-age children with specific language impairment.

机构信息

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Dec;54(6):1597-608. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0213). Epub 2011 Sep 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated the psychometric properties of 2 oral language measures that are commonly used for diagnostic purposes with school-age children who have language impairments.

METHOD

Two hundred sixteen children with specific language impairment were assessed with the Test of Language Development-Primary, Third Edition (TOLD-P:3; Newcomer & Hammill, 1997) and the Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL; Carrow-Woolfolk, 1999) within a 3-month period. The concurrent and construct validities of these 2 published tests were explored through correlation analysis and principle-component factor analysis.

RESULTS

The TOLD-P:3 Spoken Language Quotient and CASL Core Composite scores were found to have an intertest correlation value of r = .596 within this sample, and a paired samples t test revealed a statistically significant difference between these scores. Principle-component factor analyses revealed a 2-factor structure solution for the TOLD-P:3, whereas data from the CASL supported a single-factor model.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyses of assessment measure performance data from a sample of school-age children with specific language impairment revealed concurrent validity values and construct validity patterns that differed from those found in the norming samples as cited in examiner manuals. Implications for practice patterns and future research are discussed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查两种常用于语言障碍儿童诊断的口语语言测量工具的心理计量学特性。

方法

在 3 个月的时间内,对 216 名特定语言障碍儿童进行了语言发展测试-第三版(TOLD-P:3;Newcomer & Hammill,1997)和口语语言综合评估(CASL;Carrow-Woolfolk,1999)的评估。通过相关分析和主成分因子分析探讨了这两种已发表测试的同时效和构念效度。

结果

在该样本中,TOLD-P:3 口语语言商数和 CASL 核心综合分数的测试间相关系数为 r =.596,配对样本 t 检验显示这些分数之间存在统计学显著差异。主成分因子分析显示 TOLD-P:3 存在 2 因素结构解决方案,而 CASL 的数据支持单因素模型。

结论

对特定语言障碍学龄儿童样本的评估测量表现数据进行的分析显示,与测试手册中引用的常模样本相比,同时效值和构念效度模式存在差异。讨论了对实践模式和未来研究的影响。

相似文献

1
Concurrent and construct validity of oral language measures with school-age children with specific language impairment.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Dec;54(6):1597-608. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0213). Epub 2011 Sep 19.
2
Finite Verb Morphology Composite Between Age 4 and Age 9 for the Edmonton Narrative Norms Instrument: Reference Data and Psychometric Properties.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jan 8;51(1):128-143. doi: 10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-0028. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
4
Norm-Referenced Language Test Selection Practices for Elementary School Children With Suspected Developmental Language Disorder.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021 Jan 19;52(1):288-303. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00067. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
5
School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists' Perspectives on Diagnostic Decision Making.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 May 3;27(2):796-812. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-16-0121.
6
The use of the Renfrew Bus Story with 5-8-year-old Australian children.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Jun;17(3):304-13. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1024168. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
8
A comparison of oral narratives in children with specific language and non-specific language impairment.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2010 Aug;24(8):622-45. doi: 10.3109/02699201003736403.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening for Language Difficulties in Disadvantaged Populations on Entry to Early Years Education: Challenges and Opportunities.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 25;10:833603. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.833603. eCollection 2022.
2
Consequential differences in perspectives and practices concerning children with developmental language disorders: an integrative review.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Jul;54(4):529-552. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12469. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
3
Measurement of expressive vocabulary in school-age children: Development and application of the Kilifi Naming Test (KNT).
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2019 Jan-Mar;8(1):24-39. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2017.1378579. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Psychometric Properties of Language Assessments for Children Aged 4-12 Years: A Systematic Review.
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 7;8:1515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01515. eCollection 2017.
5
Language outcomes at 12 years for children exposed prenatally to cocaine.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Oct;56(5):1662-76. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0119).
6
Longitudinal profiles of expressive vocabulary, syntax and pragmatic language in boys with fragile X syndrome or Down syndrome.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):432-43. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12019. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
7
Influence of implantation age on school-age language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users.
Int J Audiol. 2013 Apr;52(4):219-29. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.759666. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Four Vocabulary Tests Administered to Preschool-Age Children.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1999 Apr 1;30(2):196-206. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461.3002.196.
2
The EpiSLI database: a publicly available database on speech and language.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010 Jan;41(1):108-17. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0057).
3
The diagnostic accuracy and construct validity of the structured photographic expressive language test--preschool: second edition.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2009 Apr;40(2):150-60. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2008/07-0049). Epub 2008 Oct 7.
6
The diagnostic and predictive validity of the Renfrew Bus Story.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2007 Oct;38(4):390-9. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2007/040).
8
The preschool repetition test: an evaluation of performance in typically developing and clinically referred children.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Apr;50(2):429-43. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/030).
9
The dimensionality of language ability in school-age children.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Dec;49(6):1193-208. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/086).
10
The composition of normative groups and diagnostic decision making: shooting ourselves in the foot.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006 Aug;15(3):247-54. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2006/023).

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验