Cantelmo N L, Babikian V L, Johnson W C, Samaraweera R, Hyde C, Pochay V E
Department of Surgery, Boston Veterans Administration Medical Center, MA 02130.
J Vasc Surg. 1990 Jun;11(6):786-91; discussion 791-2. doi: 10.1067/mva.1990.19750.
To evaluate the usefulness of transcranial Doppler sonography in determining severity of extracranial carotid disease, we compared transcranial Doppler, ocular pneumoplethysmography, Doppler spectral analysis, and duplex scanning data to information derived from cerebral angiography. Fifty-one consecutive patients with unilateral extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis or occlusion were selected. Transcranial Doppler indexes included the peak systolic flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery ipsilateral to the stenosed internal carotid artery (iMCAFV), the difference between the peak systolic flow velocities in the middle cerebral artery ipsilateral and contralateral to the stenosed internal carotid artery (dMCAFV), and the peak systolic flow velocity in the anterior cerebral artery contralateral to the stenosed internal carotid artery (cACAFV). The minimal residual lumen determined angiographically was used as the index of internal carotid artery stenosis. Linear regression analysis with minimal residual lumen as the dependent variable and transcranial Doppler and noninvasive tests as independent variables showed the following correlation coefficients: (1) dMCAFV and cACAFV, R2 = 0.3170; (2) ocular pneumoplethysmography, R2 = 0.4798; (3) dMCAFV, cACAFV, delta ocular pneumoplethysmography, duplex scanning, and spectral analysis R2 = 0.6382; (4) ocular pneumoplethysmography, duplex scanning, and spectral analysis, R2 = 0.6491; (5) iMCAFV, no association. These results were supported by sensitivity and specificity as well as bivariate analysis. We conclude that transcranial Doppler did not significantly add to the information obtained by our noninvasive battery of tests in the evaluation of unilateral extracranial carotid disease.
为评估经颅多普勒超声在确定颅外颈动脉疾病严重程度方面的效用,我们将经颅多普勒、眼体积描记法、多普勒频谱分析和双功扫描数据与来自脑血管造影的信息进行了比较。选取了51例连续的单侧颅外颈内动脉狭窄或闭塞患者。经颅多普勒指标包括狭窄颈内动脉同侧大脑中动脉的收缩期峰值流速(iMCAFV)、狭窄颈内动脉同侧和对侧大脑中动脉收缩期峰值流速之差(dMCAFV)以及狭窄颈内动脉对侧大脑前动脉的收缩期峰值流速(cACAFV)。血管造影确定的最小残余管腔用作颈内动脉狭窄的指标。以最小残余管腔为因变量、经颅多普勒和非侵入性检查为自变量的线性回归分析显示了以下相关系数:(1)dMCAFV和cACAFV,R2 = 0.3170;(2)眼体积描记法,R2 = 0.4798;(3)dMCAFV、cACAFV、眼体积描记法差值、双功扫描和频谱分析,R2 = 0.6382;(4)眼体积描记法、双功扫描和频谱分析,R2 = 0.6491;(5)iMCAFV,无关联。这些结果得到了敏感性、特异性以及双变量分析的支持。我们得出结论,在评估单侧颅外颈动脉疾病时,经颅多普勒并未显著增加我们通过一系列非侵入性检查所获得的信息。