• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Workplace social capital and adherence to antihypertensive medication: a cohort study.工作场所社会资本与抗高血压药物依从性:队列研究。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024732. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
2
Association Between Patient-Clinician Relationships and Adherence to Antihypertensive Medications Among Black Adults: An Observational Study Design.患者-临床医生关系与黑人成年人抗高血压药物依从性之间的关联:一项观察性研究设计。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e019943. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019943. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
Medication adherence before an increase in antihypertensive therapy: a cohort study using pharmacy claims data.降压治疗增加前的药物依从性:一项使用药房报销数据的队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Jun;27(6):773-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.06.004.
4
Drug adherence for antihypertensive medications and its determinants among adult hypertensive patients attending in chronic clinics of referral hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部转诊医院慢性病门诊成年高血压患者的降压药物依从性及其影响因素
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Apr 5;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40360-017-0134-9.
5
Do psychological attributes matter for adherence to antihypertensive medication? The Finnish Public Sector Cohort Study.心理特征对降压药物依从性有影响吗?芬兰公共部门队列研究。
J Hypertens. 2008 Nov;26(11):2236-43. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32830dfe5f.
6
Workplace social capital and risk of chronic and severe hypertension: a cohort study.工作场所社会资本与慢性和重度高血压风险:一项队列研究。
J Hypertens. 2012 Jun;30(6):1129-36. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835377ed.
7
Effect of medication adherence on blood pressure control and risk factors for antihypertensive medication adherence.药物依从性对血压控制的影响及抗高血压药物依从性的危险因素。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Feb;21(1):166-72. doi: 10.1111/jep.12268. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
Duration of initial antihypertensive prescription and medication adherence: a cohort study among 203,259 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients.初始抗高血压处方的持续时间和药物依从性:一项对203,259名新诊断高血压患者的队列研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 1;182:503-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.12.058. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
9
Evaluation of Hypertension-Related Knowledge, Medication Adherence, and Associated Factors Among Hypertensive Patients in the Aljouf Region, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯朱夫地区高血压患者的高血压相关知识、药物依从性及相关因素评估:一项横断面研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 6;60(11):1822. doi: 10.3390/medicina60111822.
10
Workplace determinants of social capital: cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from a Finnish cohort study.工作场所的社会资本决定因素:来自芬兰队列研究的横断面和纵向证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 11;8(6):e65846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065846. Print 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between social capital and medication adherence among frail and pre-frail older people: a cross-sectional study from China.社会资本与虚弱及脆弱前期老年人药物依从性的关系:一项来自中国的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 5;25(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21253-7.
2
Social Capital and Depressive Episodes: Gender Differences in the ELSA-Brasil Cohort.社会资本与抑郁发作:ELSA-Brasil 队列的性别差异。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 17;9:657700. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.657700. eCollection 2021.
3
Social capital and cost-related medication nonadherence (CRN): A retrospective longitudinal cohort study using the Health and Retirement Study data, 2006-2016.社会资本与药物费用相关的治疗依从性差(CRN):一项使用2006 - 2016年健康与退休研究数据的回顾性纵向队列研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Oct 5;12:100671. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100671. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Associations between psychosocial work environments and social capital: a multilevel analysis study in a Chinese context.工作心理社会环境与社会资本的关联:基于中国背景的多层次分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):976. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5916-5.
5
Psychometric assessment of a scale to measure bonding workplace social capital.用于衡量工作场所社会资本联结的量表的心理测量评估。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179461. eCollection 2017.
6
Does worksite social capital enhance retention into a worksite weight-loss programme?工作场所的社会资本会提高员工参与工作场所减肥计划的持续性吗?
Obes Sci Pract. 2016 Mar;2(1):69-74. doi: 10.1002/osp4.31. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
7
Workplace social capital, mental health and health behaviors among Brazilian female workers.巴西职业女性的职场社会资本、心理健康与健康行为
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;51(9):1321-30. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1232-5. Epub 2016 May 7.
8
Underuse of medication for circulatory disorders among unmarried women and men in Norway?挪威未婚男女中循环系统疾病药物使用不足?
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Nov 24;15:65. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-65.
9
Blood pressure control in hypertensive patients in the "Hiperdia Program": a territory-based study.“Hiperdia项目”中高血压患者的血压控制:一项基于地区的研究。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Jun;102(6):571-8. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140081.
10
The mediating and moderating effects of workplace social capital on the associations between adverse work characteristics and psychological distress among Japanese workers.工作场所社会资本对日本工人不良工作特征与心理困扰之间关联的中介和调节作用。
Ind Health. 2014;52(4):313-23. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2014-0032. Epub 2014 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions of social capital and cost-related non-adherence to medication among the elderly.老年人对社会资本的认知与药物费用相关不依从性。
Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Feb;27(2):269-76. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011000200008.
2
Sleep disturbances as a predictor of cause-specific work disability and delayed return to work.睡眠障碍作为特定病因的工作残疾和延迟返工的预测指标。
Sleep. 2010 Oct;33(10):1323-31. doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.10.1323.
3
ASH position paper: Adherence and persistence with taking medication to control high blood pressure.ASH 立场文件:坚持并持续服用药物控制高血压。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010 Oct;12(10):757-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00356.x. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
4
Multicenter cluster-randomized trial of a multifactorial intervention to improve antihypertensive medication adherence and blood pressure control among patients at high cardiovascular risk (the COM99 study).多中心整群随机对照试验,针对具有较高心血管风险的患者,实施多因素干预措施以提高抗高血压药物治疗依从性和血压控制水平(COM99 研究)。
Circulation. 2010 Sep 21;122(12):1183-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.892778. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
5
Multi-level, cross-sectional study of workplace social capital and smoking among Japanese employees.多层次、横断面研究日本员工工作场所社会资本与吸烟的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 17;10:489. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-489.
6
Does workplace social capital buffer the effects of job stress? A cross-sectional, multilevel analysis of cigarette smoking among U.S. manufacturing workers.工作场所社会资本是否能缓冲工作压力的影响?对美国制造业工人吸烟行为的横断面、多层次分析。
J Occup Environ Med. 2010 Jul;52(7):740-50. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181e80842.
7
The Nordic countries as a cohort for pharmacoepidemiological research.北欧国家作为药物流行病学研究的队列。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010 Feb;106(2):86-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00494.x. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
8
Prospective study of workplace social capital and depression: are vertical and horizontal components equally important?职场社会资本与抑郁的前瞻性研究:纵向和横向成分同样重要吗?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Aug;64(8):684-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.086074. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
9
Medication adherence and use of generic drug therapies.药物依从性和仿制药治疗的使用。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jul;15(7):450-6.
10
Intensifying therapy for hypertension despite suboptimal adherence.尽管依从性欠佳仍强化高血压治疗。
Hypertension. 2009 Sep;54(3):524-9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.133389. Epub 2009 Jul 6.

工作场所社会资本与抗高血压药物依从性:队列研究。

Workplace social capital and adherence to antihypertensive medication: a cohort study.

机构信息

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024732. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0024732
PMID:21931836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3170374/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While hypertension is a common and treatable health problem, adherence to antihypertensive medication remains a challenge. This study examines the hypothesis that workplace social capital may influence adherence to antihypertensive medication among hypertensive employees.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We linked survey responses to nationwide pharmacy records for a cohort of 3515 hypertensive employees (mean age 53.9 years, 76% women) who required continuous antihypertensive drug therapy (the Finnish Public Sector study). A standard scale was used to measure workplace social capital from co-workers' assessments and self-reports in 2000-2004. Non-adherence to antihypertensive medication was determined based on the number of days-not-treated at the year following the survey using comprehensive prescription records. Negative binomial regression models were conducted adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics, duration of hypertension, behaviour-related risk factors, and co-morbid conditions. The overall rate of days-not-treated was 20.7 per person-year (78% had no days-not-treated). Higher age, obesity, and presence of somatic co-morbidities were all associated with better adherence, but this was not the case for co-worker-assessed or self-reported workplace social capital. The rate of days-not-treated was 19.7 per person-year in the bottom fourth of co-worker-assessed workplace social capital, compared to 20.4 in the top fourth. The corresponding rate ratio from the fully-adjusted model was 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-1.56). In a subgroup of 907 new users of antihypertensive medication this rate ratio was 0.98 (95% CI 0.42-2.29).

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found no consistent evidence to support the hypothesized effect of workplace social capital on adherence to drug therapy among employees with chronic hypertension.

摘要

背景

尽管高血压是一种常见且可治疗的健康问题,但高血压患者坚持服用降压药仍然是一个挑战。本研究检验了这样一个假设,即工作场所社会资本可能会影响高血压员工对降压药物的依从性。

方法/主要发现:我们将调查应答与全国范围内的药店记录相联系,对 3515 名需要持续抗高血压药物治疗的高血压员工(平均年龄 53.9 岁,76%为女性,芬兰公共部门研究)进行了队列研究。2000-2004 年,采用同事评估和自我报告的标准量表来衡量工作场所社会资本。根据调查后一年的未治疗天数,利用全面的处方记录来确定抗高血压药物的不依从情况。采用负二项回归模型,调整了社会人口统计学特征、高血压持续时间、行为相关危险因素和合并症。总的未治疗天数率为每人每年 20.7 天(78%的人没有未治疗天数)。年龄较大、肥胖和存在躯体合并症与更好的依从性相关,但同事评估或自我报告的工作场所社会资本则不然。在同事评估的工作场所社会资本处于第四分位以下的人群中,未治疗天数率为每人每年 19.7 天,而在第四分位以上的人群中,这一比率为每人每年 20.4 天。来自完全调整模型的相应率比值为 0.95(95%置信区间为 0.58-1.56)。在新使用抗高血压药物的 907 名患者亚组中,该比率比值为 0.98(95%置信区间为 0.42-2.29)。

结论/意义:我们没有发现一致的证据支持工作场所社会资本对慢性高血压员工药物治疗依从性的假设影响。