Krueger P, Neumann A, Schweiberer L
Chirurgische Klinik Innenstadt und Chirurgische Poliklinik der Universität München.
Orthopade. 1990 Apr;19(2):97-102.
The advantages of arthroscopic refixation and augmentation of the cruciate ligament in comparison to open methods are conserving innervation of the most important structures of the knee joint, a clear-cut reduction in morbidity, and more rapid rehabilitation of the knee joint. In principle, however, as far as ligament replacement and fixation of the augmented ligament parts are concerned, the technique corresponds to the open method. As the early results refer to a period of 2 years at most, however, it is too soon to report them. Nevertheless, the results of follow-up in our present study are identical to those previously reported by other authors.
与开放手术方法相比,关节镜下十字韧带修复与增强术的优势在于保留膝关节最重要结构的神经支配、明显降低发病率以及膝关节更快康复。然而,原则上,就韧带置换和增强韧带部分的固定而言,该技术与开放手术方法是一致的。不过,由于早期结果最多涉及2年时间,现在报告这些结果还为时过早。尽管如此,我们目前研究的随访结果与其他作者先前报告的结果相同。