• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性验证 IMPACT 模型作为严重创伤性脑损伤预后工具的研究。

Prospective independent validation of IMPACT modeling as a prognostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):47-52. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1482. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2010.1482
PMID:21933014
Abstract

Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been fraught with failure due in part to heterogeneity in pathology and insensitive outcome measurements. The International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (IMPACT) prognostic model has been purposed as a means of risk adjustment and outcome prediction for use in trial design and analysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the IMPACT model in predicting 6-month functional outcome and mortality using prospectively collected data at a large, Level 1 neurotrauma center. This population-based cohort study included all TBI patients ≥14 years of age admitted with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≤8 (severe TBI) to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between July 1994 and May 2009. Clinical data were prospectively collected and linked to 6-month functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]) and mortality. The discriminatory power and calibration of the three iterations of the IMPACT model (core, extended, and lab) were assessed using multiple regression analyses and indicated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). A sample of 587 patients was available for analysis; the mean age was 37.8±17 years. The median 6-month GOS was 3 (IQR 3); 6-month mortality was 41%. The prognostic models were composed of age, motor score, and pupillary reactivity (core model), Marshall grade on head CT and secondary insults (extended), and laboratory values (lab); all of these displayed good prediction ability for unfavorable outcome and mortality (unfavorable outcome AUC=0.76, 0.79, 0.76; mortality AUC=0.78, 0.83, 0.83, respectively). All model iterations displayed adequate calibration for predicting unfavorable outcome and mortality. Prospective, independent validation supports the IMPACT prognostic model's prediction of patient 6-month functional status and mortality after severe TBI. The IMPACT prognostic model is an effective instrument to assist TBI study design and analysis.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的临床试验由于病理学的异质性和不敏感的结果测量而屡屡失败。国际创伤性脑损伤预后和临床试验分析使命(IMPACT)预后模型被提出作为一种用于试验设计和分析的风险调整和结果预测的手段。本研究的目的是使用大型一级神经创伤中心前瞻性收集的数据评估 IMPACT 模型预测 6 个月功能结局和死亡率的性能。这项基于人群的队列研究纳入了 1994 年 7 月至 2009 年 5 月期间,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分≤8(严重 TBI)收入匹兹堡大学医学中心的所有年龄≥14 岁的 TBI 患者。前瞻性收集临床数据,并与 6 个月功能结局(格拉斯哥结局量表[GOS])和死亡率相关联。使用多元回归分析评估了 IMPACT 模型的三个迭代(核心、扩展和实验室)的判别能力和校准,并通过接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)表示。共有 587 例患者可用于分析;平均年龄为 37.8±17 岁。中位数 6 个月 GOS 为 3(IQR 3);6 个月死亡率为 41%。预后模型由年龄、运动评分和瞳孔反应(核心模型)、头部 CT 上的马歇尔分级和继发性损伤(扩展)以及实验室值(实验室)组成;所有这些都对不良结局和死亡率有良好的预测能力(不良结局 AUC=0.76、0.79、0.76;死亡率 AUC=0.78、0.83、0.83)。所有模型迭代均显示出良好的预测不良结局和死亡率的校准。前瞻性、独立验证支持 IMPACT 预后模型对严重 TBI 后患者 6 个月功能状态和死亡率的预测。IMPACT 预后模型是协助 TBI 研究设计和分析的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Prospective independent validation of IMPACT modeling as a prognostic tool in severe traumatic brain injury.前瞻性验证 IMPACT 模型作为严重创伤性脑损伤预后工具的研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):47-52. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1482. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
2
Prognosis in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the IMPACT models and the role of extracranial injuries.中重度创伤性脑损伤的预后:IMPACT 模型的外部验证及颅外损伤的作用。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Feb;74(2):639-46. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827d602e.
3
Brief episodes of intracranial hypertension and cerebral hypoperfusion are associated with poor functional outcome after severe traumatic brain injury.短暂性颅内高压和脑灌注不足与重度创伤性脑损伤后的功能预后不良有关。
J Trauma. 2011 Aug;71(2):364-73; discussion 373-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822820da.
4
External validation of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury.CRASH和IMPACT严重创伤性脑损伤预后模型的外部验证
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jul 1;31(13):1146-52. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3003. Epub 2014 May 12.
5
Novel methods to predict increased intracranial pressure during intensive care and long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and validation in a multicenter dataset.新型方法预测重症监护期间颅内压升高和创伤性脑损伤后的长期神经预后:多中心数据集的开发和验证。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):554-64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182742d0a.
6
Validation of a prognostic score for early mortality in severe head injury cases.严重颅脑损伤病例早期死亡率预后评分的验证
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121(6):1314-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS131874. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
7
The development of acute lung injury is associated with worse neurologic outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.急性肺损伤的发生与重度创伤性脑损伤患者较差的神经学预后相关。
J Trauma. 2003 Jul;55(1):106-11. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000071620.27375.BE.
8
Performance of IMPACT, CRASH and Nijmegen models in predicting six month outcome of patients with severe or moderate TBI: an external validation study.IMPACT、CRASH和奈梅亨模型在预测重度或中度创伤性脑损伤患者六个月预后中的表现:一项外部验证研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Nov 19;22:68. doi: 10.1186/s13049-014-0068-9.
9
IMPACT Score for Traumatic Brain Injury: Validation of the Prognostic Tool in a Spanish Cohort.创伤性脑损伤的IMPACT评分:在西班牙队列中对该预后工具的验证
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000292.
10
Predicted Unfavorable Neurologic Outcome Is Overestimated by the Marshall Computed Tomography Score, Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH), and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) Models in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Managed with Early Decompressive Craniectomy.在接受早期减压性颅骨切除术治疗的重度创伤性脑损伤患者中,Marshall计算机断层扫描评分、重度颅脑损伤后皮质类固醇随机试验(CRASH)以及创伤性脑损伤临床试验预后与分析国际任务组(IMPACT)模型对不良神经学预后的预测存在高估。
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:554-558. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.051. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
MRI and Clinical Variables for Prediction of Outcomes After Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.MRI 和临床变量预测小儿严重创伤性脑损伤后的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425765. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25765.
2
Use of magnetic source imaging to assess recovery after severe traumatic brain injury-an MEG pilot study.使用磁源成像评估重度创伤性脑损伤后的恢复情况——一项脑磁图初步研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 3;14:1257886. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1257886. eCollection 2023.
3
PREDICT-TBI: Comparison of Physician Predictions with the IMPACT Model to Predict 6-Month Functional Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury.
PREDICT-TBI:医生预测与IMPACT模型对创伤性脑损伤6个月功能结局预测的比较
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Oct;39(2):455-463. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01718-0. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
4
Performance of CRASH and IMPACT Prognostic Models for Traumatic Brain Injury at 12 and 24 Months Post-Injury.CRASH和IMPACT创伤性脑损伤预后模型在伤后12个月和24个月时的表现。
Neurotrauma Rep. 2023 Mar 1;4(1):118-123. doi: 10.1089/neur.2022.0082. eCollection 2023.
5
Performance of the IMPACT and Helsinki models for predicting 6-month outcomes in a cohort of patients with traumatic brain injury undergoing cranial surgery.IMPACT模型和赫尔辛基模型在预测接受颅脑手术的创伤性脑损伤患者队列6个月预后方面的表现。
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 31;13:1031865. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1031865. eCollection 2022.
6
Dynamic predictors of in-hospital and 3-year mortality after traumatic brain injury: A retrospective cohort study.创伤性脑损伤后住院和 3 年死亡率的动态预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Am J Surg. 2023 Apr;225(4):781-786. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
7
Prognostic Models in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.重度创伤性脑损伤的预后模型:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Dec;37(3):790-805. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01547-7. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
8
The leap to ordinal: Detailed functional prognosis after traumatic brain injury with a flexible modelling approach.从等级跳跃:使用灵活建模方法对创伤性脑损伤后的详细功能预后。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0270973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270973. eCollection 2022.
9
Outcome Prediction in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Deep Learning from Head CT Scans.基于头部 CT 扫描的深度学习对重度创伤性脑损伤患者的预后预测。
Radiology. 2022 Aug;304(2):385-394. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212181. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
10
The early-stage triple-negative breast cancer landscape derives a novel prognostic signature and therapeutic target.早期三阴性乳腺癌的研究揭示了一种新的预后标志物和治疗靶点。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jun;193(2):319-330. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06537-z. Epub 2022 Mar 25.