Centre of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Dec;12(13):1258-66. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70140-1. Epub 2011 Sep 18.
CNS relapse occurs in about 5% of patients during the course of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and entails a dismal prognosis. This consideration has led to the adoption of CNS prophylaxis, although known risk factors do not allow for an accurate prediction of CNS recurrences because they have insufficient sensitivity and specificity. Here, we review the reports of CNS events in major studies of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma before and after the introduction of rituximab, and probe the evidence that underlies prophylactic strategies such as intrathecal or high-dose intravenous chemotherapy. Now that rituximab is available, CNS prophylaxis relies on little-if any-evidence and should not be routinely administered. Nonetheless, several patient subgroups probably have a high risk of systemic and CNS relapses, and how to manage their treatment is a challenge. These subgroups include patients with testicular lymphoma or those who have more than one extranodal site involved plus at least one additional risk factor. For such patients, we recommend against prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy because of the rare occurrence of isolated leptomeningeal relapses, the absence of evidence-based efficacy, and the potential harmful side-effects that are associated with this procedure. Because many CNS events are a result of primary resistance to treatment or accompany systemic relapses, high-dose intravenous methotrexate has been suggested as an alternative approach that needs to be validated in prospective controlled trials.
中枢神经系统(CNS)复发发生在弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的病程中约 5%,并带来不良预后。鉴于此,人们采用了中枢神经系统预防性治疗,尽管已知的危险因素无法准确预测 CNS 复发,因为它们的敏感性和特异性不足。在这里,我们回顾了在利妥昔单抗引入前后弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的主要研究报告中 CNS 事件的情况,并探讨了支持鞘内或高剂量静脉化疗等预防性策略的证据。现在利妥昔单抗已经可用,中枢神经系统预防性治疗的依据很少(如果有的话),不应该常规进行。尽管如此,一些患者亚组可能具有高的全身和中枢神经系统复发风险,如何处理他们的治疗是一个挑战。这些亚组包括睾丸淋巴瘤患者或有一个以上结外部位受累和至少一个附加危险因素的患者。对于这些患者,我们不建议预防性鞘内化疗,因为孤立性脑膜复发的发生率较低,缺乏基于证据的疗效,而且该操作可能会产生潜在的有害副作用。由于许多 CNS 事件是治疗原发性耐药或伴随全身复发的结果,因此高剂量静脉甲氨蝶呤已被提议作为一种替代方法,需要在前瞻性对照试验中得到验证。