Musial Frauke, Büssing Arndt, Heusser Peter, Choi Kyung-Eun, Ostermann Thomas
The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Norway.
Forsch Komplementmed. 2011;18(4):192-202. doi: 10.1159/000330714. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the relevant existing evidence, and critically appraises the use of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in cancer care. Furthermore, a meta-analysis was conducted in order to investigate the effect of MBSR on quality of life (QoL), mood, and distress. Besides 6 reviews (5 systematic, 1 meta-analytic) which are reported separately, a total of 19 original research papers fully met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. The 19 original papers consisted of 5 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 4 non-randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), 9 observational studies (OS) and 1 two-arm observational study. The included outcome measures were QoL, mood, and distress. Cohen's effect size d was computed for each category. Estimating the effect on QoL, a total of n = 248 patients out of 6 studies was included and the overall effect size was 0.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.40; p ≤ 0.00005). Calculating the effect on mood, a total of n = 411 patients out of ten studies were included, and the overall effect size was 0.42 (95% CI 0.26-0.58; p < 0.0001). Reduction in distress revealed an overall effect size of 0.58 (95% CI 0.45-0.72; p < 0.0001; n = 587 patients out of 15 studies). MBSR programmes can improve QoL and mood, and reduce distress in cancer patients. However, there is an urgent need for more high quality RCTs implementing adequate controls, longer follow-up periods, sufficient samples sizes, clear descriptions of patients' psychological profiles, and the accompanying utilisation of qualitative measures.
本文全面概述了相关现有证据,并对基于正念减压疗法(MBSR)在癌症护理中的应用进行了批判性评估。此外,还进行了一项荟萃分析,以研究MBSR对生活质量(QoL)、情绪和痛苦的影响。除了单独报告的6篇综述(5篇系统综述、1篇荟萃分析)外,共有19篇原创研究论文完全符合系统综述的纳入标准。这19篇原创论文包括5项随机对照试验(RCT)、4项非随机对照试验(NRCT)、9项观察性研究(OS)和1项双臂观察性研究。纳入的结局指标为生活质量、情绪和痛苦。计算了每个类别的科恩效应量d。在评估对生活质量的影响时,6项研究中共有n = 248例患者纳入分析,总体效应量为0.29(95%置信区间(CI)0.17 - 0.40;p≤0.00005)。在计算对情绪的影响时,10项研究中共有n = 411例患者纳入分析,总体效应量为0.42(95% CI 0.26 - 0.58;p < 0.0001)。痛苦减轻的总体效应量为0.58(95% CI 0.45 - 0.72;p < 0.0001;15项研究中共有n = 587例患者)。MBSR方案可改善癌症患者的生活质量和情绪,并减轻痛苦。然而,迫切需要更多高质量的RCT,这些研究应实施适当的对照、更长的随访期、足够的样本量、对患者心理特征的清晰描述以及同时使用定性测量方法。