Suppr超能文献

新辅助放化疗后组织学缓解对 UICC-T3 胰腺腺癌无复发生存率的影响,但对 UICC-T4 无影响。

Impact of histological response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on recurrence-free survival in UICC-T3 pancreatic adenocarcinoma but not in UICC-T4.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu City, Japan.

出版信息

Pancreas. 2012 Jan;41(1):130-6. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182236442.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although the prognostic benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) against pancreatic cancer has been indicated by several reports, it is controversial whether histological response is associated with prognosis. The objective was to explore the relationship between histological response and prognosis in T3 and T4 pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

We histologically examined the resected specimens obtained from 58 patients (T3, n = 40; and T4, n = 18) for whom we performed curative-intent resection after NCRT. Histological response was evaluated according to Evans's criteria to determine whether it influenced survival.

RESULTS

In T3 tumors, 13 (32.5%) belonged to high responders (tumor destruction of >50%) (R0, n = 13) and 27 (67.5%) belonged to low responders (tumor destruction of ≤50%) (R0, n = 22, R1, n = 3, R2, n = 2). Recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in high responders than in low responders (3-year recurrence-free survival rates: 71.3% vs 13.1%, P = 0.0095). In T4 tumors, however, only 1 (5.6%) was a high responder, and R0 resection was obtained only in 5 patients (27.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In T3 tumors, histological response is considered a significant prognostic indicator, securing the surgical margin, whereas in T4 tumors, NCRT did not provide beneficial histological response, not securing the surgical margin.

摘要

目的

尽管有多项报道表明新辅助放化疗(NCRT)对胰腺癌具有预后益处,但组织学反应是否与预后相关仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨 T3 和 T4 胰腺腺癌中组织学反应与预后的关系。

方法

我们对 58 例接受 NCRT 后行根治性切除术的患者(T3 患者 n=40,T4 患者 n=18)的切除标本进行了组织学检查。根据 Evans 标准评估组织学反应,以确定其是否影响生存。

结果

在 T3 肿瘤中,13 例(32.5%)为高反应者(肿瘤破坏>50%)(R0,n=13),27 例(67.5%)为低反应者(肿瘤破坏≤50%)(R0,n=22,R1,n=3,R2,n=2)。高反应者的无复发生存率明显高于低反应者(3 年无复发生存率:71.3% vs 13.1%,P=0.0095)。然而,在 T4 肿瘤中,仅有 1 例(5.6%)为高反应者,仅 5 例(27.8%)获得 R0 切除。

结论

在 T3 肿瘤中,组织学反应被认为是一个重要的预后指标,可确保手术切缘;而在 T4 肿瘤中,NCRT 并未提供有益的组织学反应,无法确保手术切缘。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验