Mallory D L, McGee W T, Shawker T H, Brenner M, Bailey K R, Evans R G, Parker M M, Farmer J C, Parillo J E
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Chest. 1990 Jul;98(1):157-60. doi: 10.1378/chest.98.1.157.
To compare conventional versus ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation techniques.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive either conventional or two-dimensional ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation. Patients who could not be cannulated with five or fewer passes by either technique, were crossed over to the other technique.
Clinical research unit in a tertiary care center.
All consecutive patients who required urgent or urgent-elective internal jugular vein cannulation during the study period.
The two-dimensional ultrasound transducer imaged all cannulation attempts. For patients randomized to ultrasound guidance, the operator viewed two-dimensional ultrasound images, and received verbal guidance from the ultrasound technician. For patients randomized to the conventional arm, two-dimensional ultrasound images were recorded without visual or verbal feedback.
Two-dimensional ultrasound was significantly better than conventional guidance in reducing the number of failed site cannulations from 6/17 (35 percent), to 0/12 (0 percent), p less than 0.05. Two-dimensional ultrasound also reduced the mean number of passes required to cannulate the vein from 3.12 to 1.75 (p less than .05), and was also successful in six/six (100) of patients who failed cannulation by conventional means (p less than 0.05).
Intensivists can increase successful internal jugular vein cannulation using ultrasound guidance. Two-dimensional ultrasound should be considered for patients difficult to cannulate or those at high risk of cannulation complications.
比较传统与超声引导下颈内静脉置管技术。
患者被随机分配接受传统或二维超声引导下的颈内静脉置管。两种技术在五次或更少穿刺仍无法成功置管的患者,转而采用另一种技术。
三级护理中心的临床研究单位。
研究期间所有需要紧急或紧急择期颈内静脉置管的连续患者。
二维超声换能器对所有置管尝试进行成像。对于随机分配至超声引导组的患者,操作者查看二维超声图像,并接受超声技师的口头指导。对于随机分配至传统组的患者,记录二维超声图像但无视觉或口头反馈。
二维超声在减少置管失败次数方面显著优于传统引导,从6/17(35%)降至0/12(0%),p<0.05。二维超声还将成功置管所需的平均穿刺次数从3.12次降至1.75次(p<0.05),并且在6/6(100%)例传统方法置管失败的患者中也取得成功(p<0.05)。
重症监护医生可通过超声引导提高颈内静脉置管成功率。对于难以置管或置管并发症高风险患者,应考虑使用二维超声。