Suppr超能文献

肱二头肌长头肌腱评估:术前超声的准确性。

Long head of biceps brachii tendon evaluation: accuracy of preoperative ultrasound.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct;197(4):942-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of ultrasound to accurately identify long head of biceps brachii (LHB) tendon abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The surgical findings for 66 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery were retrospectively compared with the findings of preoperative ultrasound examination. Patients were excluded if more than 200 days elapsed between ultrasound and surgery. Ultrasound images were obtained using high-frequency transducers and were compared with findings at arthroscopy for the presence of LHB tendon abnormalities, including full-thickness tears, partial-thickness tears, or nontear abnormalities, including tendinosis and tenosynovitis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated for full- and partial-thickness tears.

RESULTS

Ultrasound correctly identified 90% (35/39) of normal LHB tendons, 88% (7/8) of full-thickness tears, 27% (3/11) of partial-thickness tears, and 22% (2/9) of tendons with nontear abnormality in those patients who underwent surgery. In the ultrasound diagnosis of full-thickness tear versus other findings, sensitivity was 0.88, specificity was 0.98, PPV was 0.88, NPV was 0.98, and accuracy was 0.97; in the ultrasound diagnosis of partial-thickness tear versus other findings, sensitivity was 0.27, specificity was 1.00, PPV was 1.00, NPV was 0.88, and accuracy was 0.88, in those patients who underwent surgery.

CONCLUSION

Shoulder ultrasound is an accurate method to confirm a normal biceps tendon or full-thickness tear, but is less accurate in the diagnosis of partial-thickness tear and nontear abnormalities.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨超声检查准确识别肱二头肌长头腱(LHB)异常的能力。

材料和方法

回顾性比较 66 例连续接受关节镜肩关节手术患者的手术发现与术前超声检查结果。如果超声检查与手术之间的时间超过 200 天,则排除患者。使用高频换能器获取超声图像,并将其与关节镜检查结果进行比较,以确定 LHB 肌腱异常的存在,包括全层撕裂、部分层撕裂或非撕裂异常,包括肌腱病和腱鞘炎。计算全层和部分层撕裂的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。

结果

在接受手术的患者中,超声正确识别了 90%(35/39)的正常 LHB 肌腱、88%(7/8)的全层撕裂、27%(3/11)的部分层撕裂和 22%(2/9)的非撕裂异常。在超声诊断全层撕裂与其他发现方面,敏感性为 0.88,特异性为 0.98,PPV 为 0.88,NPV 为 0.98,准确性为 0.97;在超声诊断部分层撕裂与其他发现方面,敏感性为 0.27,特异性为 1.00,PPV 为 1.00,NPV 为 0.88,准确性为 0.88。

结论

肩关节超声是一种准确的方法,可以确认正常的二头肌肌腱或全层撕裂,但在诊断部分层撕裂和非撕裂异常方面准确性较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验