Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1849-54. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.068. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
Radical prostatectomy outcomes may be better at academic institutions than at nonacademic centers. We examined the effect of academic status on 5 short-term radical prostatectomy outcomes.
In the Health Care Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample we focused on radical prostatectomy performed within the 7 most contemporary years (2001 to 2007). We tested the rates of homologous blood transfusions and extended length of stay, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications stratified according to institutional academic status. Multivariable logistic regression analyses further adjusted for confounding variables.
Overall 89,965 radical prostatectomies were identified, yielding a weighted national estimate of 442,811. Of those procedures 58.2% were recorded at academic institutions. Patients at academic institutions had a lower Charlson comorbidity index and more frequently had private insurance (p <0.001). Radical prostatectomy at academic institutions was associated with fewer blood transfusions (5.4% vs 7.4%), fewer postoperative complications (10.1% vs 12.9%) and lower rates of hospital stay above the median (18.0% vs 28.2%). On multivariable analyses institutional academic status exerted a protective effect on postoperative complication rates (OR 0.93, p = 0.02) and on rates of hospital stay in excess of the median (OR 0.91, p <0.001). Similarly radical prostatectomy performed at hospitals with a high annual caseload were less frequently associated with intraoperative (OR 0.8, p = 0.01) and postoperative (OR 0.63, p <0.001) complications, length of stay beyond the median (OR 0.19, p <0.001) and homologous blood transfusions (OR 0.35, p <0.001).
Even after adjusting for annual hospital caseload, radical prostatectomy performed at academic institutions is associated with better outcomes than radical prostatectomy performed at nonacademic institutions. This relationship illustrates averages and does not imply that academic institutions invariably offer better care.
在学术机构中,根治性前列腺切除术的结果可能优于非学术中心。我们研究了学术地位对 5 种短期根治性前列腺切除术结果的影响。
在全国住院患者利用项目医疗保健利用项目中,我们主要关注 2001 年至 2007 年 7 年内进行的根治性前列腺切除术。我们根据机构学术地位对同种异体输血和延长住院时间以及围手术期和术后并发症的发生率进行了分层测试。多变量逻辑回归分析进一步调整了混杂变量。
共确定了 89965 例根治性前列腺切除术,全国估计有 442811 例。其中 58.2%的手术在学术机构进行。与学术机构相比,患者的 Charlson 合并症指数较低,且更常具有私人保险(p<0.001)。在学术机构进行的根治性前列腺切除术与较少的输血(5.4% vs. 7.4%)、较少的术后并发症(10.1% vs. 12.9%)以及低于中位数的住院时间(18.0% vs. 28.2%)相关。多变量分析显示,机构学术地位对术后并发症发生率(OR 0.93,p=0.02)和超过中位数的住院时间(OR 0.91,p<0.001)有保护作用。同样,在每年手术量较大的医院进行的根治性前列腺切除术与术中(OR 0.8,p=0.01)和术后(OR 0.63,p<0.001)并发症、超过中位数的住院时间(OR 0.19,p<0.001)和同种异体输血(OR 0.35,p<0.001)的相关性较低。
即使在调整了医院的年手术量后,与非学术机构相比,在学术机构中进行的根治性前列腺切除术与更好的结果相关。这种关系表明平均值,并不意味着学术机构总是提供更好的护理。