Suppr超能文献

危重症创伤患者的中心静脉导管相关血流感染

Central line-associated blood stream infection in the critically ill trauma patient.

作者信息

Smith Jason W, Egger Michael, Franklin Glen, Harbrecht Brian, Richardson J David

机构信息

University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2011 Aug;77(8):1038-42.

Abstract

Blood stream infections in the critically ill are a common cause of morbidity. Strict adherence to sterile technique can reduce central line-associated blood stream infections (CLBSIs) and has become a quality improvement measure. We did a retrospective review of 6,014 trauma admissions representing 10,370 catheter days. CLBSI was defined as a positive blood culture with central venous access without evidence of other infectious sources. Thirty-five CLBSIs were identified in the study period (3.26/1,000 line days). The average Injury Severity Score was 32, the average intensive care unit stay was 24 days, and the average overall length of stay was 34 days, which is higher than that of nonCLBSI patients. In 25/35 cases, there was a break in sterile technique during central venous catheter placement (71%). Of the 25 cases, 16 of them were performed in the intensive care unit (64%), five in the operating room (20%), and four in the emergency department (16%). Twenty of the 35 patients with CLBSI (57%) had a total of 24 infections, a 2-fold increase in infectious complications for a given Injury Severity Score. Seventeen (17) of the 25 "dirty" central lines (68%) were changed within 24 hours in an effort to reduce the risk of CLBSI without success. A large percentage of CLBSI can be traced to the initial placement of a central venous line under less than ideal sterile technique. Changing a line within 24 hours may not be sufficient to reduce the risk of CLBSI. Every effort should be made to adhere to proper sterile technique while placing central venous catheter.

摘要

重症患者的血流感染是发病的常见原因。严格遵守无菌技术可减少中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLBSIs),并已成为一项质量改进措施。我们对6014例创伤入院患者进行了回顾性研究,共涉及10370个导管日。CLBSI被定义为中心静脉通路血培养阳性且无其他感染源证据。在研究期间共识别出35例CLBSIs(3.26/1000导管日)。平均损伤严重度评分为32分,平均重症监护病房住院时间为24天,平均总住院时间为34天,均高于非CLBSI患者。在35例病例中的25例(71%),中心静脉导管置入过程中存在无菌技术违规。在这25例中,16例在重症监护病房进行(64%),5例在手术室进行(20%),4例在急诊科进行(16%)。35例CLBSI患者中有20例(57%)共发生24次感染,在给定损伤严重度评分下感染并发症增加了2倍。25根“污染”中心静脉导管中的17根(68%)在24小时内更换,以降低CLBSI风险,但未成功。很大一部分CLBSI可追溯到在不太理想的无菌技术下最初置入中心静脉导管。在24小时内更换导管可能不足以降低CLBSI风险。在置入中心静脉导管时应尽一切努力遵守适当的无菌技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验