Rehabilitation Engineering and Applied Research Lab, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Tissue Viability. 2012 Feb;21(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
A variety of wound measurement techniques are available to clinicians. Options range from relatively simple and inexpensive to complex, expensive devices. An iterative design approach was used to evaluate and improve performance and clinical utility of a new wound measurement device (WMD). The design was based upon a commercially available Smartphone. Accuracy was assessed using bench testing and reliability of area measurements was determined using multiple evaluators. Clinical utility was investigated by deploying the WMD during wound rounds in a rehabilitation hospital. Accuracy testing revealed an average error <2% at 0° or skew and an average error of 4.28% at 10° of skew. The intra-rater reliability exceeded 0.975 for all raters and inter-rater reliability was 0.966. Clinical utility testing provided the opportunity to address several usability concerns including the software interface and computation times. The accuracy and reliability of a new, non-contact wound measurement device exceeded that of other manual techniques and were, at least, equivocal to other computer-based technologies. Some limitations of using a Smartphone were identified by the clinicians that can be addressed by the more advanced processing power of newer technology. Overall, the WMD was shown to have the potential as a useful clinical tool.
临床医生可使用多种伤口测量技术。这些技术的选择范围很广,从相对简单且经济实惠的到复杂、昂贵的设备都有。我们采用迭代设计方法来评估和改进新型伤口测量设备(WMD)的性能和临床实用性。该设计基于市售的智能手机。我们通过台架测试评估准确性,通过多位评估者确定面积测量的可靠性。我们通过在康复医院的伤口查房中部署 WMD 来研究其临床实用性。准确性测试显示,在 0°或偏斜度下的平均误差<2%,在 10°偏斜度下的平均误差为 4.28%。所有评估者的内部评估者可靠性均超过 0.975,而评估者间可靠性为 0.966。临床实用性测试为解决包括软件界面和计算时间在内的一些可用性问题提供了机会。新型非接触式伤口测量设备的准确性和可靠性超过了其他手动技术,至少与其他基于计算机的技术相当。临床医生发现使用智能手机存在一些限制,这些限制可以通过更新的技术更先进的处理能力来解决。总的来说,WMD 有潜力成为一种有用的临床工具。