Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Sep 25;29(10):908-14. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1975.
Whole exome sequencing by high-throughput sequencing of target-enriched genomic DNA (exome-seq) has become common in basic and translational research as a means of interrogating the interpretable part of the human genome at relatively low cost. We present a comparison of three major commercial exome sequencing platforms from Agilent, Illumina and Nimblegen applied to the same human blood sample. Our results suggest that the Nimblegen platform, which is the only one to use high-density overlapping baits, covers fewer genomic regions than the other platforms but requires the least amount of sequencing to sensitively detect small variants. Agilent and Illumina are able to detect a greater total number of variants with additional sequencing. Illumina captures untranslated regions, which are not targeted by the Nimblegen and Agilent platforms. We also compare exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing (WGS) of the same sample, demonstrating that exome sequencing can detect additional small variants missed by WGS.
高通量测序目标富集基因组 DNA(外显子组测序)的全外显子组测序已成为基础和转化研究中的常见方法,可相对低成本地检测人类基因组的可解释部分。我们比较了三种主要的商业外显子组测序平台,分别来自安捷伦、Illumina 和 Nimblegen,它们应用于同一人类血液样本。我们的结果表明,唯一使用高密度重叠探针的 Nimblegen 平台覆盖的基因组区域比其他平台少,但需要最少的测序量来灵敏地检测小变异。Agilent 和 Illumina 通过额外的测序能够检测到更多的变异。Illumina 捕获非翻译区,而 Nimblegen 和 Agilent 平台则不针对这些区域。我们还比较了同一样本的外显子组测序和全基因组测序(WGS),表明外显子组测序可以检测到 WGS 遗漏的其他小型变异。