Federal pre-emption under the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act from Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr; Pliva. Inc. v. Mensing.
作者信息
Ball Frederick R
机构信息
Duane Morris LLP, Chicago, USA.
出版信息
Health Care Law Mon. 2011 Sep;2011(9):2-8.
PMID:21949984
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Federal pre-emption under the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act from Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr; Pliva. Inc. v. Mensing.
Health Care Law Mon. 2011 Sep;2011(9):2-8.
2
Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr.
Food Drug Law J. 1996;51(4):613-8.
3
Medical device preemption after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr.
Food Drug Law J. 1996;51(4):619-29.
4
License to maim: federal pre-emption and the Medical Device Amendments of 1976.
Health Matrix Clevel. 1996 Summer;6(2):349-89.
5
Federal preemption of common law tort awards by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Food Drug Law J. 1996;51(4):509-611.
6
Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.: revisiting pre-emption for medical devices.
J Law Med Ethics. 2009 Summer;37(2):305-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00374.x.
7
The impact of FDA reform.
Med Device Technol. 2003 Apr;14(3):36-7.
8
King v. Collagen Corporation: FDA approval insulates medical device manufacturers from state common law liability.
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1995 Spring;11(2):563-87.
9
The FDA defense: a prescription for easing the pain of punitive damage awards in medical products liability cases.
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 1997 Sep(223):9-45.
10
Zotero 插件