Suppr超能文献

融合与非手术治疗慢性下腰痛:社会人口因素是否影响疗效?

Fusion versus nonoperative management for chronic low back pain: do sociodemographic factors affect outcome?

机构信息

Spine Surgery Fellowship, Cleveland Clinic, Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44130, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S75-86. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef68c.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this systematic review were to determine whether sociologic and demographic factors modify the effect of fusion versus nonoperative management in patients with chronic low back pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Chronic low back pain is among the most common symptoms leading patients to seek medical care and presents significant challenges in treatment decision making. This is due to the wide array of pathologic conditions causing back pain, the multitude of patient variables (i.e., litigation, psychologic issues, social issues) that are thought to influence the perception of back pain, and the wide variation in treatment response. Sociodemographic factors are thought to play a role in pain perception and treatment response, though this has been poorly assessed in the literature.

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature, focused on randomized controlled trials to assess the heterogeneity of treatment effect of sociodemographic factors on the outcomes of fusion versus nonoperative care of the treatment of chronic low back pain.

RESULTS

The only sociologic factors evaluated in randomized controlled trials adequate to assess heterogeneity of treatment effect are pending litigation, worker's compensation, sick leave, and heavy labor job type. Litigation patients, although thought to do poorly with treatment of chronic low back pain in general, responded more favorably to fusion than nonoperative care. Likewise, patients with lighter jobs and those patients who were not on sick leave did better with fusion than nonoperative care. No demographic factors were observed to respond more favorably to one treatment over the other.

CONCLUSION

Sociodemographic factors are not well studied in the literature, but are assumed to affect treatment outcomes. After rigorous review, few studies held up to the standards required for defining the comparative treatment effect of these factors. Pending litigation may negatively impact outcomes of patients with chronic low back pain; however, those who underwent fusion had better outcomes than those with nonoperative management in two European studies. There is no evidence to suggest that sociodemographic factors alone should preclude surgery. Well-constructed prospective randomized studies with predefined subgroup analyses are required to further understand the impact of sociodemographic factors in the treatment of chronic low back pain.

CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Sociodemographic factors should be considered when making treatment decisions for patients with chronic low back pain, but alone do not preclude fusion for chronic low back pain. Strength of recommendation: Weak.

摘要

研究设计

系统评价。

目的

本系统评价旨在确定社会学和人口统计学因素是否会改变慢性下腰痛患者融合与非手术治疗的效果。

背景资料概要

慢性下腰痛是导致患者寻求医疗的最常见症状之一,在治疗决策方面带来了重大挑战。这是由于引起背痛的病理状况广泛,影响背痛感知的患者变量众多(例如,诉讼、心理问题、社会问题),以及治疗反应的差异很大。社会人口统计学因素被认为在疼痛感知和治疗反应中起作用,但这在文献中评估得很差。

方法

对文献进行系统评价,重点是随机对照试验,以评估社会学因素对融合与非手术治疗慢性下腰痛治疗效果的异质性。

结果

仅评估了随机对照试验中足以评估治疗效果异质性的社会学因素,包括待决诉讼、工人赔偿、病假和重体力劳动工作类型。尽管患有诉讼的患者通常被认为在治疗慢性下腰痛方面表现不佳,但他们对融合的反应比对非手术治疗更为有利。同样,从事较轻工作和未休病假的患者对融合的反应比对非手术治疗更为有利。没有观察到任何人口统计学因素对一种治疗方法的反应比对另一种治疗方法更为有利。

结论

社会人口统计学因素在文献中研究不足,但被认为会影响治疗结果。经过严格审查,很少有研究符合定义这些因素的比较治疗效果的标准。待决诉讼可能会对慢性下腰痛患者的结果产生负面影响;然而,在两项欧洲研究中,接受融合治疗的患者比接受非手术治疗的患者有更好的结果。没有证据表明仅社会人口统计学因素就应排除手术。需要进行精心设计的前瞻性随机研究,并进行预设的亚组分析,以进一步了解社会人口统计学因素在慢性下腰痛治疗中的影响。

临床建议

在为慢性下腰痛患者做出治疗决策时应考虑社会人口统计学因素,但这些因素本身并不能排除慢性下腰痛的融合治疗。推荐强度:弱。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验