The University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Nov;45(11):1425-32. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q241. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
To summarize published data regarding the safety and efficacy of probiotics in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
PubMed databases (January 2000-August 2011) were searched and a bibliographic review of published articles was performed to identify original reports of probiotic administration for the prevention of VAP using the search terms probiotics, synbiotics, and ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Two pilot studies, 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 1 meta-analysis have addressed probiotic use for VAP prevention and were included in the review.
VAP frequently occurs in mechanically ventilated patients. Given the lack of new antimicrobial agents, probiotics have been studied for their ability to modify human microflora colonization. Two studies examining pathogen colonization rates favored probiotics, with reduced incidence and increased duration until the emergence of new species. One prospective RCT found significant reduction in the incidence of VAP and colonization rates, but no significant difference in patient disposition outcomes. Another RCT examining 28-day mortality found no overall benefit with probiotic use and no reduction in colonization rates.
Clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a consistent beneficial effect of probiotics in mechanically ventilated patients; thus, they are not recommended for routine clinical use. However, heterogeneity among study designs may hinder this assessment and the designs should be unified in future research.
总结关于益生菌预防呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的安全性和有效性的已发表数据。
检索了 PubMed 数据库(2000 年 1 月至 2011 年 8 月),并对已发表文章的文献进行了综述,以确定使用益生菌、合生菌和呼吸机相关性肺炎等搜索词预防 VAP 的益生菌给药的原始报告。
有 2 项初步研究、2 项随机对照试验(RCT)和 1 项荟萃分析探讨了益生菌用于预防 VAP 的问题,并被纳入了综述。
机械通气患者常发生 VAP。鉴于缺乏新的抗菌药物,益生菌已被研究用于改变人体微生物定植。两项研究检查了病原体定植率,益生菌组的发病率较低,且新物种出现的时间延长。一项前瞻性 RCT 发现 VAP 的发病率和定植率显著降低,但患者处置结果无显著差异。另一项研究 28 天死亡率的 RCT 发现益生菌使用没有总体获益,也没有降低定植率。
临床试验未能证明益生菌对机械通气患者有一致的有益作用;因此,不建议常规临床使用。然而,研究设计的异质性可能会阻碍这一评估,未来的研究应统一设计。