Département de Physiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar;23(3):302-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02180.x. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
The atrioventricular node (AV) node conducts slowly and filters atrial impulses. Puzzlingly, the recovery (conduction time vs atrial cycle length) and refractory curve (His bundle cycle length vs atrial cycle length) characterizing AV nodal function undergo disparate rate-dependent changes. We sought the functional origin and significance of these disparate changes.
Differences between the recovery and refractory curve were assessed in 30 steady state AV nodal responses (all potential paired combinations between 5 basic and 6 pretest cycle lengths imposed with S(1)S(2)S(3) protocols) in rabbit heart preparations. Five of these responses corresponded to standard premature protocols. Both basic and pretest cycle length shortenings increased pretest conduction time that in turn equally shortened the ensuing His-atrial interval at all test cycle lengths. This effect was mathematically predictable and tended to shift the refractory curve downward whereas not affecting the recovery curve. Moreover, increases in pretest conduction time also shifted the recovery and refractory curve equally rightward on their x-axis, thereby biasing curve comparison between steady states. This problem could be overcome with equivalent results either by accordingly correcting the atrial cycle length or by using the His-atrial interval as the recovery index.
Recovery and refractory curves from AV nodal steady state responses including standard premature protocols only differ by the His-atrial interval that decreases with the pretest conduction time. The latter also biases curve comparison between steady states. Rate-dependent AV nodal function is best assessed with recovery curves freed from changes in pretest conduction time.
房室结(AV)结传导缓慢并滤过心房冲动。令人费解的是,表征 AV 结功能的恢复(传导时间与心房周期长度的关系)和不应期曲线(希氏束周期长度与心房周期长度的关系)呈现出不同的速率依赖性变化。我们试图寻找这些不同变化的功能起源和意义。
在兔心标本中,评估了 30 个稳定状态 AV 结反应(所有潜在的基本 5 个和预测试 6 个周期长度之间的配对组合,通过 S(1)S(2)S(3) 方案施加)的恢复和不应期曲线之间的差异。其中 5 个反应对应于标准的提前方案。基本和预测试周期长度的缩短都会增加预测试传导时间,进而在所有测试周期长度下,同样缩短随后的希氏-心房间期。这种效应是可以通过数学预测的,倾向于使不应期曲线向下移动,而不影响恢复曲线。此外,预测试传导时间的增加也会使恢复和不应期曲线在其 x 轴上同等地向右移动,从而在稳定状态之间对曲线进行比较产生偏差。通过相应地校正心房周期长度或以希氏-心房间期作为恢复指数,可以获得等效的结果来克服这个问题。
包括标准提前方案在内的 AV 结稳定状态反应的恢复和不应期曲线仅在希氏-心房间期上存在差异,而希氏-心房间期随预测试传导时间的延长而减小。后者也会使稳定状态之间的曲线比较产生偏差。最好通过从预测试传导时间变化中解脱出来的恢复曲线来评估速率依赖性 AV 结功能。