• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中介、消费者和互联网:北美消费者如何应对不孕之旅。

Brokers, consumers and the internet: how North American consumers navigate their infertility journeys.

机构信息

Anthropology, Eckerd College, St. Petersburg, FL 33711, USA.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):592-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.005
PMID:21955489
Abstract

North Americans who suffer infertility often reach an end to treatment options at home, whether it is due to a lack of egg donors in Canada or the high cost of treatment in the USA. Patients navigate their way onto the internet, seeking support and other options. As women and couples 'do the research' online, they conduct endless Google searches, come across IVF brokers, join support groups, read blogs and meet others on the road of infertility. This paper considers the journeys that North American patients make to clinics in Moravia, Czech Republic. Along these travels, patients engage with support groups, other patients, IVF brokers and clinic co-ordinators. Since the distance travelled between North America and Europe is extensive, reproductive travels may be arranged by clinical staff, travel brokers and patients. Acting as consumers, North Americans make different 'choices' along their journeys – the use of a broker, if and when they should join online communities, which clinic to visit and where to stay. This study focuses on the question of how patient choices often determine the success of brokers and clinics, thus influencing the structure of cross-border reproductive care in the Czech Republic.

摘要

北美地区的不孕不育患者在国内往往会面临治疗方案的选择困境,这可能是由于加拿大缺乏卵子捐赠者,也可能是因为美国的治疗费用高昂。患者们会上网寻求支持和其他选择。当女性和夫妇在网上“做研究”时,他们会进行无休止的谷歌搜索,接触到体外受精中介,加入支持小组,阅读博客,并在不孕不育的道路上结识其他人。本文探讨了北美患者前往捷克摩拉维亚地区诊所的旅程。在这些旅行中,患者会与支持小组、其他患者、体外受精中介和诊所协调员互动。由于北美和欧洲之间的距离很远,生殖旅行可能由临床工作人员、旅行中介和患者共同安排。作为消费者,北美患者在旅途中会做出不同的“选择”——是否使用中介、何时加入在线社区、选择哪家诊所就诊以及在哪里住宿。本研究关注的问题是,患者的选择如何常常决定中介和诊所的成败,从而影响捷克的跨境生殖护理结构。

相似文献

1
Brokers, consumers and the internet: how North American consumers navigate their infertility journeys.中介、消费者和互联网:北美消费者如何应对不孕之旅。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):592-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
Reproductive agency and projects: Germans searching for egg donation in Spain and the Czech Republic.生殖机构与项目:在西班牙和捷克寻找捐卵的德国人。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):600-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
3
Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers.北美跨境生育服务:对加拿大和美国提供者的调查。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):e16-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
4
Fertility patients' experiences of cross-border reproductive care.生育患者跨境生殖保健的体验。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;94(1):e11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.046. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
5
Cross-border reproductive care: market forces in action or market failure? An economic perspective.跨境生殖保健:市场力量在起作用还是市场失灵?经济视角。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Dec;23(7):817-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
6
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.丹麦的不孕症与辅助生殖。流行病学及心理社会后果。
Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417.
7
Cross-border reproductive care in Belgium.比利时跨境生殖护理。
Hum Reprod. 2009 Dec;24(12):3108-18. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep300. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
8
The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings for the new millennium.跨境生殖保健的全球格局:新千年的 20 项关键发现。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;24(3):158-63. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328352140a.
9
Reproductive tourism in Argentina: clinic accreditation and its implications for consumers, health professionals and policy makers.阿根廷的生殖旅游:诊所认证及其对消费者、卫生专业人员和政策制定者的影响。
Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Aug;10(2):59-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00256.x. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
10
Diasporic dreaming: return reproductive tourism to the Middle East.离散的梦想:将生殖旅游带回中东。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Nov;23(5):582-91. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of cross-border reproductive care and pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective evaluation of IVF conceptions.跨境生殖护理的发生率及妊娠结局:体外受精受孕情况的回顾性评估
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03449-x.
2
Uterus transplantation: from research, through human trials and into the future.子宫移植:从研究到临床试验再到未来。
Hum Reprod Update. 2023 Sep 5;29(5):521-544. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmad012.
3
Accounting for complexity in healthcare innovation debates: Professional views on the use of new IVF treatments.
考量医疗保健创新辩论中的复杂性:关于新型体外受精治疗应用的专业观点。
Health (London). 2023 Nov;27(6):907-923. doi: 10.1177/13634593221074874. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility preferences in the United States: an exploratory study.新冠疫情对美国生育偏好的早期影响:一项探索性研究。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Oct;116(4):1128-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.092. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
5
The Role of professional facilitators in cross-border assisted reproduction.专业协调人在跨境辅助生殖中的作用。
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Nov 9;6:60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.013. eCollection 2018 Aug.
6
Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review).跨境生殖保健(CBRC):一个具有多维度影响的日益增长的全球现象(系统和批判性评价)。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jul;35(7):1277-1288. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1181-x. Epub 2018 May 28.
7
How Infertility Patients and Providers View and Confront Religious and Spiritual Issues.不孕不育患者及医疗服务提供者如何看待和应对宗教与精神问题。
J Relig Health. 2018 Feb;57(1):223-239. doi: 10.1007/s10943-017-0528-4.
8
Understanding the impact of gendered roles on the experiences of infertility amongst men and women in Punjab.了解性别角色对旁遮普邦男性和女性不孕经历的影响。
Reprod Health. 2013 Jan 15;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-3.