• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持向量机、人工神经网络和贝叶斯分类器在致突变性预测中的比较研究。

A comparative study of support vector machine, artificial neural network and bayesian classifier for mutagenicity prediction.

机构信息

Department of Bioinformatics, Indian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad Deoghat, Jhalwa, Allahabad, 211012, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Interdiscip Sci. 2011 Sep;3(3):232-9. doi: 10.1007/s12539-011-0102-9. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s12539-011-0102-9
PMID:21956745
Abstract

Mutagenicity is the capability of a chemical to carry out mutations in genetic material of an organism. In order to curtail expensive drug failures due to mutagenicity found in late development or even in clinical trials, it is crucial to determine potential mutagenicity problems as early as possible. In this work we have proposed three different classifiers, i.e. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and bayesian classifiers, for the prediction of mutagenicity of compounds based on seventeen descriptors. Among the three classifiers Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel based SVM classifier appeared to be more accurate for classifying the compounds under study on mutagens and non-mutagens. The overall prediction accuracy of SVM model was found to be 71.73% which was appreciably higher than the accuracy of ANN based classifier (59.72%) and bayesian classifier (66.61%). It suggests that SVM based prediction model can be used for predicting mutagenicity more accurately compared to ANN and bayesian classifier for data under consideration.

摘要

致突变性是一种化学物质使生物体遗传物质发生突变的能力。为了减少因在后期开发甚至临床试验中发现致突变性而导致昂贵药物失败的情况,尽早确定潜在的致突变性问题至关重要。在这项工作中,我们提出了三种不同的分类器,即支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)和贝叶斯分类器,用于根据十七个描述符预测化合物的致突变性。在这三种分类器中,基于径向基函数(RBF)核的 SVM 分类器似乎更能准确地区分研究中的致突变化合物和非致突变化合物。SVM 模型的整体预测准确性为 71.73%,明显高于基于 ANN 的分类器(59.72%)和贝叶斯分类器(66.61%)的准确性。这表明,与 ANN 和贝叶斯分类器相比,SVM 基于预测模型可更准确地预测致突变性,尤其是针对所考虑的数据。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of support vector machine, artificial neural network and bayesian classifier for mutagenicity prediction.支持向量机、人工神经网络和贝叶斯分类器在致突变性预测中的比较研究。
Interdiscip Sci. 2011 Sep;3(3):232-9. doi: 10.1007/s12539-011-0102-9. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
2
In silico prediction of chemical Ames mutagenicity.计算机预测化学物质的致突变性。
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Nov 26;52(11):2840-7. doi: 10.1021/ci300400a. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
3
Support vector machine: classifying and predicting mutagenicity of complex mixtures based on pollution profiles.支持向量机:基于污染特征对复杂混合物的致突变性进行分类和预测。
Toxicology. 2013 Nov 16;313(2-3):151-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
4
A support vector machine classifier reduces interscanner variation in the HRCT classification of regional disease pattern in diffuse lung disease: comparison to a Bayesian classifier.支持向量机分类器减少了弥漫性肺疾病中区域性疾病模式 HRCT 分类中的扫描仪间变异性:与贝叶斯分类器的比较。
Med Phys. 2013 May;40(5):051912. doi: 10.1118/1.4802214.
5
Novel naïve Bayes classification models for predicting the chemical Ames mutagenicity.用于预测化学物质艾姆斯致突变性的新型朴素贝叶斯分类模型。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2017 Jun;41:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
6
Comparison of support vector machine and artificial neural network systems for drug/nondrug classification.支持向量机与人工神经网络系统用于药物/非药物分类的比较。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003 Nov-Dec;43(6):1882-9. doi: 10.1021/ci0341161.
7
Application of knowledge discovery process on the prediction of stroke.知识发现过程在中风预测中的应用。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015 May;119(3):181-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
8
Support vector machine regression (LS-SVM)--an alternative to artificial neural networks (ANNs) for the analysis of quantum chemistry data?支持向量机回归(LS-SVM)——一种替代人工神经网络(ANNs)的方法,用于分析量子化学数据?
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011 Jun 28;13(24):11710-8. doi: 10.1039/c1cp00051a. Epub 2011 May 19.
9
A deep neural network-based approach for prediction of mutagenicity of compounds.基于深度神经网络的化合物突变预测方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(34):47641-47650. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14028-9. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
10
Predicting mutagenicity of aromatic amines by various machine learning approaches.用各种机器学习方法预测芳香胺的致突变性。
Toxicol Sci. 2010 Aug;116(2):498-513. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq159. Epub 2010 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of machine learning and deep learning models for toxicity prediction.机器学习和深度学习模型在毒性预测中的应用综述。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2023 Nov;248(21):1952-1973. doi: 10.1177/15353702231209421. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
2
A neuro-fuzzy approach in the classification of students' academic performance.神经模糊方法在学生学业成绩分类中的应用。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2013;2013:179097. doi: 10.1155/2013/179097. Epub 2013 Nov 4.