• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用 ACS-NSQIP 评估伤口分类系统的手术部位感染。

An evaluation of surgical site infections by wound classification system using the ACS-NSQIP.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287-0005, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2012 May 1;174(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.056. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.056
PMID:21962737
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical wound classification has been the foundation for infectious risk assessment, perioperative protocol development, and surgical decision-making. The wound classification system categorizes all surgeries into: clean, clean/contaminated, contaminated, and dirty, with estimated postoperative rates of surgical site infection (SSI) being 1%-5%, 3%-11%, 10%-17%, and over 27%, respectively. The present study evaluates the associated rates of the SSI by wound classification using a large risk adjusted surgical patient database.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) dataset between 2005 and 2008. All surgical cases that specified a wound class were included in our analysis. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay, preoperative risk factors, co-morbidities, and complication rates were compared across the different wound class categories. Surgical site infection rates for superficial, deep incisional, and organ/space infections were analyzed among the four wound classifications using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 634,426 cases were analyzed. From this sample, 49.7% were classified as clean, 35.0% clean/contaminated, 8.56% contaminated, and 6.7% dirty. When stratifying by wound classification, the clean, clean/contaminated, contaminated, and dirty wound classifications had superficial SSI rates of 1.76%, 3.94%, 4.75%, and 5.16%, respectively. The rates of deep incisional infections were 0.54%, 0.86%, 1.31%, and 2.1%. The rates for organ/space infection were 0.28%, 1.87%, 2.55%, and 4.54%.

CONCLUSION

Using ACS-NSQIP data, the present study demonstrates substantially lower rates of surgical site infections in the contaminated and dirty wound classifications than previously reported in the literature.

摘要

背景

手术伤口分类一直是感染风险评估、围手术期方案制定和手术决策的基础。伤口分类系统将所有手术分为:清洁、清洁/污染、污染和肮脏,估计术后手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率分别为 1%-5%、3%-11%、10%-17%和超过 27%。本研究使用大型风险调整手术患者数据库评估了伤口分类相关的 SSI 发生率。

方法

使用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据集进行横断面研究,时间为 2005 年至 2008 年。我们的分析包括所有指定伤口类别的手术病例。比较不同伤口类别患者的人口统计学特征、住院时间、术前危险因素、合并症和并发症发生率。使用多元逻辑回归分析 4 种伤口分类的浅表、深部切口和器官/空间感染的 SSI 发生率。

结果

共分析了 634426 例病例。在该样本中,49.7%被归类为清洁,35.0%为清洁/污染,8.56%为污染,6.7%为肮脏。按伤口分类分层时,清洁、清洁/污染、污染和肮脏伤口分类的浅表 SSI 发生率分别为 1.76%、3.94%、4.75%和 5.16%。深部切口感染的发生率分别为 0.54%、0.86%、1.31%和 2.1%。器官/空间感染的发生率分别为 0.28%、1.87%、2.55%和 4.54%。

结论

使用 ACS-NSQIP 数据,本研究表明污染和肮脏伤口分类的手术部位感染率明显低于文献报道。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of surgical site infections by wound classification system using the ACS-NSQIP.利用 ACS-NSQIP 评估伤口分类系统的手术部位感染。
J Surg Res. 2012 May 1;174(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.05.056. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
2
Use of mesh during ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases: outcomes of 33,832 cases.在清洁污染和污染病例中使用网片进行腹疝修补术:33832 例的结果。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jan;255(1):176-80. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822518e6.
3
Influence of ASA score and Charlson Comorbidity Index on the surgical site infection rates.美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分和查尔森合并症指数对手术部位感染率的影响。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Aug;20(8):506-9.
4
Preoperative chemotherapy and corticosteroids: independent predictors of cranial surgical-site infections.术前化疗和皮质类固醇:颅外科部位感染的独立预测因子。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;125(1):187-95. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142719. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
5
[Surveillance of surgical wound infections. 18-month experience in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología].[手术伤口感染的监测。国立肿瘤研究所的18个月经验]
Salud Publica Mex. 1999;41 Suppl 1:S44-50.
6
Risk factors for surgical site infection following nonshunt pediatric neurosurgery: a review of 9296 procedures from a national database and comparison with a single-center experience.非分流小儿神经外科手术后手术部位感染的危险因素:对国家数据库中9296例手术的回顾及与单中心经验的比较
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Apr;19(4):407-420. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.PEDS16454. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
7
Improving surgical site infections: using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to institute Surgical Care Improvement Project protocols in improving surgical outcomes.改善手术部位感染:利用国家手术质量改进计划数据实施手术护理改进项目协议,以改善手术结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):737-41, 741-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.029.
8
Wound classification in pediatric general surgery: significant variation exists among providers.小儿普通外科的伤口分类:在提供者之间存在显著差异。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):819-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.027. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
9
Incidence of surgical site infections in general surgery in Italy.意大利普通外科手术部位感染的发生率。
Infection. 2006 Dec;34(6):310-4. doi: 10.1007/s15010-006-6632-0.
10
Wound infection in Tikur Anbessa hospital, surgical department.提古儿安贝萨医院外科的伤口感染情况。
Ethiop Med J. 2005 Jul;43(3):167-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes fueling surgical site infections: evidence, technical challenges and future directions.细菌易位至肠系膜淋巴结引发手术部位感染:证据、技术挑战及未来方向
J Transl Med. 2025 Aug 5;23(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06462-x.
2
Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections in Elective and Emergency Surgeries: A Prospective Cohort Study.择期手术和急诊手术手术部位感染的危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2025 Apr 15;39:55. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.39.55. eCollection 2025.
3
Surgical site infection among hospitalized patients in palestine: association with in-hospital preoperative time stay, biological and clinical characteristics.
巴勒斯坦住院患者手术部位感染:与住院术前停留时间、生物学和临床特征的关联
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jul 23;18(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07392-z.
4
Mesh-Augmented Ventral Hernia Repair Despite Iatrogenic -Peritonitis Due to Progressive Pneumoperitoneum: A Case Report.尽管因进行性气腹导致医源性腹膜炎,仍行补片增强腹疝修补术:一例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2025;11(1). doi: 10.70352/scrj.cr.25-0099. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
5
Effect of closed negative pressure wound therapy after laparotomy for gastrointestinal perforation: A single-center observational study.剖腹术后闭合性负压伤口治疗对胃肠道穿孔的影响:一项单中心观察性研究。
Acute Med Surg. 2025 Jun 3;12(1):e70069. doi: 10.1002/ams2.70069. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Use of a zipline skin closure device in gastroenterological surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing wound infection incidence, operation time, and cosmesis.滑索式皮肤闭合装置在胃肠外科手术中的应用:一项评估伤口感染发生率、手术时间和美容效果的多中心随机对照试验。
Surg Today. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03043-9.
7
Skin and Wound Healing: Conventional Dosage versus Nanobased Emulsions Forms.皮肤与伤口愈合:传统剂型与纳米乳液剂型对比
ACS Omega. 2025 Mar 28;10(13):12837-12855. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c00455. eCollection 2025 Apr 8.
8
Does the CDC Surgical Wound Classification adequately predict postoperative infection in lower extremity fracture surgery?美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的手术伤口分类能否充分预测下肢骨折手术的术后感染?
OTA Int. 2025 Jan 17;8(1):e357. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000357. eCollection 2025 Mar.
9
Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Negative-Suction Drain on Surgical Site Infection After Ileostomy Reversal: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.皮下负压引流对回肠造口还纳术后手术部位感染的有效性:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 3;14(1):236. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010236.
10
Delayed vs single-staged abdominal wall reconstruction in contaminated ventral hernia.污染性腹壁切口疝的延期与一期重建。
Hernia. 2024 Nov 16;29(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03195-6.