Departamento de Anestesiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Botucatu, São Paulo, CEP 18618-970, Brazil.
Vet J. 2012 Jun;192(3):311-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.08.019. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
The effects of epidural and intravenous (IV) methadone (0.5mg/kg) on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane (ISO(MAC)) were compared in dogs. Six dogs (16.5 ± 2.5 kg bodyweight) received three treatments in random order during isoflurane anaesthesia, with a 7 day washout interval between each study. Methadone was injected via a lumbosacral epidural catheter introduced 10 cm cranially into the epidural canal and the electrical stimulation for ISO(MAC) determination was applied either to the thoracic (EP(T) treatment) or to the pelvic limb (EP(P) treatment) during separate study days. In the IV treatment, ISO(MAC) was determined via electrical stimulation of the pelvic limb. Variables were recorded before (baseline), 2.5 and 5h after drug injection. The ISO(MAC) decreased significantly (P<0.05) from baseline at 2.5 and 5h after methadone in all treatments. At 2.5h, the magnitude of ISO(MAC) reduction did not differ between treatments (mean decreases from baseline: 30-33%). The ISO(MAC) reduction lasted longer following epidural methadone in the thoracic limb (decreases from baseline: 30% at 5h in the EP(T) treatment vs. 19% and 16% in the EP(P) and IV treatments, respectively). Although the isoflurane sparing effect provided by epidural methadone was not significantly greater than IV methadone during the initial stage (2.5h), it was more prolonged than the IV route in specific dermatomes (5h in the thoracic limb) with the epidural technique employed. Methadone may therefore provide a greater isoflurane sparing effect when administered epidurally, compared to IV, when noxious stimulation occurs in specific dermatomes.
硬膜外和静脉(IV)给予(0.5mg/kg)美沙酮对异氟烷(ISO)最低肺泡浓度(MAC)的影响在犬中进行了比较。在异氟烷麻醉期间,6 只犬(16.5±2.5kg 体重)随机接受 3 种处理,每次研究之间有 7 天的洗脱期。美沙酮通过在硬膜外导管中引入硬膜外腔 10cm 颅内向头侧硬膜外腔注射,在单独的研究日期间通过对胸部(EP(T)处理)或骨盆肢体(EP(P)处理)进行电刺激来确定 ISO(MAC)。在 IV 处理中,通过电刺激骨盆肢体来确定 ISO(MAC)。在药物注射前(基线)、2.5 小时和 5 小时记录变量。在所有处理中,与基线相比,美沙酮在 2.5 小时和 5 小时后 ISO(MAC)显著降低(P<0.05)。在 2.5 小时时,各处理之间 ISO(MAC)降低的幅度没有差异(从基线降低的幅度:30-33%)。在 EP(T)治疗中,在胸肢的硬膜外美沙酮作用持续时间更长(与基线相比的降低幅度:30%在 5 小时,而在 EP(P)和 IV 治疗中分别为 19%和 16%)。尽管在初始阶段(2.5 小时)硬膜外美沙酮提供的异氟烷节省效果不比 IV 美沙酮大,但与使用的硬膜外技术相比,在特定皮区(胸肢 5 小时),它比 IV 途径更持久。当特定皮区发生有害刺激时,与 IV 途径相比,硬膜外给予美沙酮可能会提供更大的异氟烷节省效果。