Pinto Pedro, Rocha Patrícia, Veiga Isabel, Guedes Joana, Pinheiro Manuela, Peixoto Ana, Pinto Carla, Fragoso Maria, Sanches Evaristo, Araújo António, Alves Fernando, Coutinho Camila, Lopes Paula, Henrique Rui, Teixeira Manuel R
Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal.
Cancer Genet. 2011 Aug;204(8):439-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2011.07.003.
Cetuximab and panitumumab are two monoclonal antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor that have been approved for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Recent clinical trials found an association between KRAS mutation status and resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy, leading to the recommendation to perform KRAS mutation analysis before cetuximab or panitumumab treatment. This study was designed to compare and evaluate the efficacy of four different methodologies--high resolution melting, Sanger sequencing, DxS kit, and SNaPshot--for KRAS mutation detection in a clinical setting. In total, 372 samples from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were analyzed by high resolution melting and SNaPshot, with 184 of those being further analyzed by Sanger sequencing and 188 with the DxS kit. Sensitivities were compared after consensus findings were determined by the presence of the same result in two of the three methodologies used in each case. The frequency of KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in our population was 43.5%, and a discordant finding was observed in 22 samples. Comparing to Sanger sequencing, significantly more consensus mutations were detected by the DxS kit (P=0.0139), high resolution melting (P=0.0004), and SNaPshot (P=0.00001), but no statistically significant differences were found among the three methodologies with higher sensitivity.
西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗是两种靶向表皮生长因子受体的单克隆抗体,已被批准用于治疗转移性结直肠癌。最近的临床试验发现KRAS突变状态与抗表皮生长因子受体治疗的耐药性之间存在关联,从而建议在使用西妥昔单抗或帕尼单抗治疗前进行KRAS突变分析。本研究旨在比较和评估四种不同方法——高分辨率熔解曲线分析、桑格测序、DxS试剂盒和SNaPshot——在临床环境中检测KRAS突变的疗效。总共对372例转移性结直肠癌患者的样本进行了高分辨率熔解曲线分析和SNaPshot检测,其中184例进一步进行了桑格测序分析,188例使用DxS试剂盒进行了分析。在每种情况下,通过三种方法中的两种获得相同结果来确定一致结果后,比较了敏感性。我们研究人群中KRAS密码子12和13突变的频率为43.5%,在22个样本中观察到不一致的结果。与桑格测序相比,DxS试剂盒(P = 0.0139)、高分辨率熔解曲线分析(P = 0.0004)和SNaPshot(P = 0.00001)检测到的一致突变明显更多,但在三种敏感性较高的方法之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。