Suppr超能文献

录像结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的影响。

The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality benchmark for colonoscopy, influenced by several factors including bowel preparation, withdrawal time, and withdrawal technique.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of video recording of all colonoscopies on the ADR.

DESIGN

Comparison of two cohorts of patients undergoing colonoscopy before and after implementation of video recording.

SETTING

Academic outpatient endoscopy facility.

PATIENTS

This study involved asymptomatic, average-risk adults undergoing screening colonoscopy.

INTERVENTION

Video recording of all colonoscopy procedures. Polyp findings and withdrawal times were recorded for 208 consecutive screening colonoscopies. A policy of video recording all colonoscopies was implemented and announced to the staff. Data on another 213 screening colonoscopies were subsequently collected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Adenoma detection rate, withdrawal time, advanced polyp detection rate, hyperplastic polyp detection rate.

RESULTS

At least one adenoma was found in 38.5% of patients after video recording versus 33.7% before video recording (P = .31). There was a significant increase in the hyperplastic polyp detection rate (44.1% vs 34.6%; P = .046). Most endoscopists had a numerical increase in their ADRs, but only one was significant (57.7% vs 22.6%; P < .01). There were trends toward higher detection of adenomas of <5 mm (59.1% vs 52%; P = .23) and right-sided adenomas (40.2% vs 30.4%; P = .11) in the video recorded group.

LIMITATIONS

No randomization, confounding of intervention effects, and sample size limitations.

CONCLUSION

Video recording of colonoscopies is associated with a nonsignificant increase in the ADR and a significant increase in the hyperplastic polyp detection rate. There may be a benefit of video recording for endoscopists with low ADRs.

摘要

背景

腺瘤检出率(ADR)是结肠镜检查的质量基准,受多种因素影响,包括肠道准备、退出时间和退出技术。

目的

评估所有结肠镜检查录像对 ADR 的影响。

设计

比较实施录像前后两组接受结肠镜检查的患者。

设置

学术门诊内镜设施。

患者

本研究纳入了接受筛查性结肠镜检查的无症状、平均风险的成年人。

干预

所有结肠镜检查程序的录像。记录了 208 例连续筛查性结肠镜检查的息肉发现和退出时间。随后实施并向工作人员宣布了所有结肠镜检查录像的政策。随后收集了另外 213 例筛查性结肠镜检查的数据。

主要观察指标

腺瘤检出率、退出时间、高级息肉检出率、增生性息肉检出率。

结果

录像后,38.5%的患者至少检出一个腺瘤,而录像前为 33.7%(P =.31)。增生性息肉检出率显著升高(44.1%比 34.6%;P =.046)。大多数内镜医生的 ADR 数值有所增加,但只有一位显著增加(57.7%比 22.6%;P <.01)。录像组中,直径<5mm 的腺瘤(59.1%比 52%;P =.23)和右侧腺瘤(40.2%比 30.4%;P =.11)的检出率呈上升趋势。

局限性

无随机分组、混杂干预效果和样本量限制。

结论

结肠镜检查录像与 ADR 的无显著增加和增生性息肉检出率的显著增加相关。录像可能对 ADR 较低的内镜医生有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验