• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

录像结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的影响。

The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048
PMID:21963062
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality benchmark for colonoscopy, influenced by several factors including bowel preparation, withdrawal time, and withdrawal technique.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of video recording of all colonoscopies on the ADR.

DESIGN

Comparison of two cohorts of patients undergoing colonoscopy before and after implementation of video recording.

SETTING

Academic outpatient endoscopy facility.

PATIENTS

This study involved asymptomatic, average-risk adults undergoing screening colonoscopy.

INTERVENTION

Video recording of all colonoscopy procedures. Polyp findings and withdrawal times were recorded for 208 consecutive screening colonoscopies. A policy of video recording all colonoscopies was implemented and announced to the staff. Data on another 213 screening colonoscopies were subsequently collected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Adenoma detection rate, withdrawal time, advanced polyp detection rate, hyperplastic polyp detection rate.

RESULTS

At least one adenoma was found in 38.5% of patients after video recording versus 33.7% before video recording (P = .31). There was a significant increase in the hyperplastic polyp detection rate (44.1% vs 34.6%; P = .046). Most endoscopists had a numerical increase in their ADRs, but only one was significant (57.7% vs 22.6%; P < .01). There were trends toward higher detection of adenomas of <5 mm (59.1% vs 52%; P = .23) and right-sided adenomas (40.2% vs 30.4%; P = .11) in the video recorded group.

LIMITATIONS

No randomization, confounding of intervention effects, and sample size limitations.

CONCLUSION

Video recording of colonoscopies is associated with a nonsignificant increase in the ADR and a significant increase in the hyperplastic polyp detection rate. There may be a benefit of video recording for endoscopists with low ADRs.

摘要

背景

腺瘤检出率(ADR)是结肠镜检查的质量基准,受多种因素影响,包括肠道准备、退出时间和退出技术。

目的

评估所有结肠镜检查录像对 ADR 的影响。

设计

比较实施录像前后两组接受结肠镜检查的患者。

设置

学术门诊内镜设施。

患者

本研究纳入了接受筛查性结肠镜检查的无症状、平均风险的成年人。

干预

所有结肠镜检查程序的录像。记录了 208 例连续筛查性结肠镜检查的息肉发现和退出时间。随后实施并向工作人员宣布了所有结肠镜检查录像的政策。随后收集了另外 213 例筛查性结肠镜检查的数据。

主要观察指标

腺瘤检出率、退出时间、高级息肉检出率、增生性息肉检出率。

结果

录像后,38.5%的患者至少检出一个腺瘤,而录像前为 33.7%(P =.31)。增生性息肉检出率显著升高(44.1%比 34.6%;P =.046)。大多数内镜医生的 ADR 数值有所增加,但只有一位显著增加(57.7%比 22.6%;P <.01)。录像组中,直径<5mm 的腺瘤(59.1%比 52%;P =.23)和右侧腺瘤(40.2%比 30.4%;P =.11)的检出率呈上升趋势。

局限性

无随机分组、混杂干预效果和样本量限制。

结论

结肠镜检查录像与 ADR 的无显著增加和增生性息肉检出率的显著增加相关。录像可能对 ADR 较低的内镜医生有益。

相似文献

1
The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.录像结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
2
Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).结肠镜退镜技术质量与腺瘤检出率的变化(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
3
The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores.周期性监测和反馈对结肠镜检查退出时间、息肉检出率和患者满意度评分的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.017.
4
Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.季度报告卡对结肠镜检查质量指标的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):925-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
5
Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates.计算虚拟 chromoendoscopy 在结直肠癌筛查中的疗效:前瞻性、随机、背靠背试验比较富士智能色彩增强与传统结肠镜检查对腺瘤漏诊率的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.055. Epub 2010 May 20.
6
Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.可调整的内镜因素对结直肠癌筛查结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):381-389.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.027. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
7
Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies.腺瘤检出率随一天中的时间和病例等级变化很小:2139 例首次筛查结肠镜检查的前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):554-60. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.021.
8
A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.采用优化退镜技术对标准结肠镜与高清结肠镜检测腺瘤和增生性息肉的比较研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep 15;28(6):768-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03789.x.
9
Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy.腺瘤在上午进行结肠镜检查时比下午更容易被检测到。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;104(7):1659-64; quiz 1665. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.249. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
10
Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.腺瘤检出率:结肠镜检查质量的真实指标。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Aug;51(8):1217-20. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9315-3. Epub 2008 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Video recording in GI endoscopy.胃肠内镜检查中的视频记录。
VideoGIE. 2025 Jan 13;10(2):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.09.013. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Will purposely seeking detect more colorectal polyps than routine performing during colonoscopy?在结肠镜检查过程中,有意寻求检测出比常规操作更多的结直肠息肉吗?
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 16;99(42):e22738. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022738.
3
Educational interventions are associated with improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
教育干预与结肠镜检查质量指标的改善相关:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1321-E1331. doi: 10.1055/a-1221-4922. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
4
Digital recording and documentation of endoscopic procedures: physicians' practice and perspectives.内镜检查操作的数字化记录和文档:医生的实践和观点。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019 Jul 2;8(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13584-019-0332-6.
5
Digital Recording and Documentation of Endoscopic Procedures: Do Patients and Doctors Think Alike?内镜操作的数字化记录与文档保存:医患观点是否一致?
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2016:2493470. doi: 10.1155/2016/2493470. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
6
The Impact of Colonoscopy Quality Control Table on Adenoma Detection Rates.结肠镜检查质量控制表对腺瘤检出率的影响。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:2548109. doi: 10.1155/2016/2548109. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
7
Seeing better--Evidence based recommendations on optimizing colonoscopy adenoma detection rate.看得更清晰——关于优化结肠镜腺瘤检出率的循证推荐
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 7;22(5):1767-78. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i5.1767.
8
Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial.领导力培训以提高结肠镜筛查中腺瘤检出率:一项随机试验。
Gut. 2016 Apr;65(4):616-24. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307503. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
9
Optimized sedation improves colonoscopy quality long-term.优化镇静可长期改善结肠镜检查质量。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:195093. doi: 10.1155/2015/195093. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
10
Procedure volume influences adherence to celiac disease guidelines.手术量影响对乳糜泻指南的遵循。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;25(11):1273-8. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283643542.