• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用优化退镜技术对标准结肠镜与高清结肠镜检测腺瘤和增生性息肉的比较研究。

A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.

作者信息

East J E, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S, Guenther T, Tekkis P P, Saunders B P

机构信息

Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep 15;28(6):768-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03789.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03789.x
PMID:18715401
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy has a known miss rate for polyps and adenomas. High definition (HD) colonoscopes may allow detection of subtle mucosal change, potentially aiding detection of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps.

AIM

To compare detection rates between HD and standard definition (SD) colonoscopy.

METHODS

Prospective, cohort study with optimized withdrawal technique (withdrawal time >6 min, antispasmodic, position changes, re-examining flexures and folds). One hundred and thirty patients attending for routine colonoscopy were examined with either SD (n = 72) or HD (n = 58) colonoscopes.

RESULTS

Groups were well matched. Sixty per cent of patients had at least one adenoma detected with SD vs. 71% with HD, P = 0.20, relative risk (benefit) 1.32 (95% CI 0.85-2.04). Eighty-eight adenomas (mean +/- standard deviation 1.2 +/- 1.4) were detected using SD vs. 93 (1.6 +/- 1.5) with HD, P = 0.12; however more nonflat, diminutive (<6 mm) adenomas were detected with HD, P = 0.03. Twenty-three proximal hyperplastic polyps (0.32 +/- 0.58) were detected with SD vs. 31 (0.53 +/- 0.86) with HD, P = 0.35. Overall prevalence of proximal large (>9 mm) hyperplastic polyps was 7% (0.09 +/- 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

High definition did not lead to a significant increase in adenoma or hyperplastic polyp detection, but may help where comprehensive lesion detection is paramount. High detection rates appear possible with either SD or HD, when using an optimized withdrawal technique.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查对息肉和腺瘤存在已知的漏诊率。高清(HD)结肠镜可能有助于发现细微的黏膜变化,从而有可能辅助腺瘤和增生性息肉的检测。

目的

比较高清结肠镜与标准清晰度(SD)结肠镜的检测率。

方法

采用优化退镜技术(退镜时间>6分钟、使用解痉剂、改变体位、重新检查弯曲部和皱襞)的前瞻性队列研究。130例接受常规结肠镜检查的患者分别使用SD结肠镜(n = 72)或HD结肠镜(n = 58)进行检查。

结果

两组匹配良好。SD结肠镜检查时60%的患者至少检测到一个腺瘤,而HD结肠镜检查时为71%,P = 0.20,相对风险(益处)为1.32(95%可信区间0.85 - 2.04)。使用SD结肠镜检测到88个腺瘤(平均±标准差1.2±1.4),而HD结肠镜检测到93个(1.6±1.5),P = 0.12;然而,HD结肠镜检测到更多的非扁平、微小(<6毫米)腺瘤,P = 0.03。SD结肠镜检测到23个近端增生性息肉(0.32±0.58),HD结肠镜检测到31个(0.53±0.86),P = 0.35。近端大(>9毫米)增生性息肉的总体患病率为7%(0.09±0.36)。

结论

高清结肠镜检查并未导致腺瘤或增生性息肉检测率显著增加,但在全面病变检测至关重要的情况下可能有所帮助。当采用优化退镜技术时,使用SD或HD结肠镜似乎都有可能实现高检测率。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.采用优化退镜技术对标准结肠镜与高清结肠镜检测腺瘤和增生性息肉的比较研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep 15;28(6):768-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03789.x.
2
Comparison of standard vs high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial.标准 vs 高清、广角结肠镜检查在息肉检测中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Oct;12(10 Online):e260-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02145.x.
3
Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.比较窄带成像和白光内镜在接受筛查或监测结肠镜检查患者中的产量和漏诊率:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;107(3):363-70; quiz 371. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.436. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
4
High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study.无放大窄带成像用于息肉组织学实时特征分析及其与高清白光结肠镜检查比较的高准确性:一项前瞻性研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct;104(10):2422-30. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.403. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
5
High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.高清电子染色结肠镜与高清白光结肠镜用于一般风险结直肠癌筛查的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1301-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.51. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
6
High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging.使用白光或窄带成像的高清结肠镜检查可发现大量小而扁平的腺瘤。
Gastroenterology. 2007 Jul;133(1):42-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.04.029. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
7
Increased incidence of colorectal adenomas in follow-up evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed hyperplastic polyps.新诊断增生性息肉患者随访评估中结直肠腺瘤发病率增加。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):646-8. doi: 10.1007/s004640000389. Epub 2001 May 14.
8
Does chromoendoscopy with structure enhancement improve the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate?结构增强型色素内镜检查能否提高结肠镜腺瘤检出率?
Endoscopy. 2006 May;38(5):444-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925265.
9
Evaluation of autofluorescence colonoscopy for the detection and diagnosis of colonic polyps.自体荧光结肠镜用于检测和诊断结肠息肉的评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Aug;68(2):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.039. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
10
Narrow-band imaging colonoscopy--a pilot feasibility study for the detection of polyps and correlation of surface patterns with polyp histologic diagnosis.窄带成像结肠镜检查——一项用于检测息肉以及表面形态与息肉组织学诊断相关性的初步可行性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Feb;67(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.07.036. Epub 2007 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel flexible near-infrared endoscopic device that enables real-time artificial intelligence fluorescence tissue characterization.一种新型的柔性近红外内镜设备,可实现人工智能实时荧光组织表征。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 13;20(3):e0317771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317771. eCollection 2025.
2
Standard-definition White-light, High-definition White-light versus Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Detecting Colorectal Adenomas: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.标准清晰度白光、高清白光与窄带成像内镜检测结直肠腺瘤的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Curr Med Sci. 2024 Jun;44(3):554-560. doi: 10.1007/s11596-024-2882-2. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
Improving sessile serrated adenoma detection rates with high definition colonoscopy: A retrospective study.
高清结肠镜检查提高无蒂锯齿状腺瘤检出率:一项回顾性研究。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Apr 16;14(4):226-234. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i4.226.
4
Factors Associated with Polyp Detection Rate in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of The European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.与欧洲结肠镜检查实践中息肉检出率相关的因素:欧洲结肠镜检查质量调查(ECQI)组的研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 13;19(6):3388. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063388.
5
Week 2020 Poster Presentations.2020年第20周海报展示。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Oct;8(8_suppl):144-887. doi: 10.1177/2050640620927345.
6
Comparison of the detection of colorectal lesions in different endoscopic modalities: A network meta-analysis and systematic review.不同内镜检查方式对结直肠病变的检测比较:一项网状Meta分析和系统评价
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Jul;18(1):154-162. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7535. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 - 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru.2016 - 2017年秘鲁一家私人健康诊所筛查性结肠镜检查的药物不良反应评估
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Nov;6(11):E1304-E1309. doi: 10.1055/a-0672-1045. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
8
Can technology increase adenoma detection rate?技术能否提高腺瘤检出率?
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 10;11:1756283X17746311. doi: 10.1177/1756283X17746311. eCollection 2018.
9
Carbon dioxide insufflation is associated with increased serrated polyp detection rate when compared to room air insufflation during screening colonoscopy.与结肠镜筛查时使用室内空气注入相比,二氧化碳注入与锯齿状息肉检出率增加相关。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Sep;5(9):E905-E912. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-116382. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
10
A guide to multimodal endoscopy imaging for gastrointestinal malignancy - an early indicator.胃肠道恶性肿瘤多模态内镜成像指南——早期指标。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jul;14(7):421-434. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.46. Epub 2017 Jun 14.