• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

就诊次数:急诊医学准备好了吗?

Episodes of care: is emergency medicine ready?

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2012 May;59(5):351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.08.020
PMID:21963317
Abstract

Optimizing resource use, eliminating waste, aligning provider incentives, reducing overall costs, and coordinating the delivery of quality care while improving outcomes have been major themes of health care reform initiatives. Recent legislation contains several provisions designed to move away from the current fee-for-service payment mechanism toward a model that reimburses providers for caring for a population of patients over time while shifting more financial risk to providers. In this article, we review current approaches to episode of care development and reimbursement. We describe the challenges of incorporating emergency medicine into the episode of care approach and the uncertain influence this delivery model will have on emergency medicine care, including quality outcomes. We discuss the limitations of the episode of care payment model for emergency services and advocate retention of the current fee-for-service payment model, as well as identify research gaps that, if addressed, could be used to inform future policy decisions of emergency medicine health policy leaders. We then describe a meaningful role for emergency medicine in an episode of care setting.

摘要

优化资源利用、杜绝浪费、调整供给方激励机制、降低总体成本、协调提供高质量医疗服务,同时改善医疗效果,这些一直是医疗改革措施的主要主题。最近的立法包含了几项条款,旨在摆脱当前按服务收费的支付机制,转向一种随着时间的推移为患者群体提供护理的模式,同时将更多的财务风险转移给提供者。在本文中,我们回顾了当前的医疗事件开发和报销方法。我们描述了将急诊医学纳入医疗事件方法的挑战,以及这种交付模式对急诊医学护理的不确定影响,包括质量结果。我们讨论了医疗事件支付模式对急诊服务的局限性,并主张保留当前的按服务收费支付模式,同时确定研究差距,如果加以解决,可用于为未来的急诊医学卫生政策领导人的政策决策提供信息。然后,我们描述了急诊医学在医疗事件设置中的重要作用。

相似文献

1
Episodes of care: is emergency medicine ready?就诊次数:急诊医学准备好了吗?
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 May;59(5):351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
2
Commentary: health care payment reform and academic medicine: threat or opportunity?述评:医疗保健支付方式改革与学术医学:威胁还是机遇?
Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):756-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d0fdfb.
3
Achieving health care cost containment through provider payment reform that engages patients and providers.通过让患者和提供者参与的提供者支付方式改革来实现医疗保健成本控制。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 May;32(5):929-34. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1007.
4
The changing landscape of america's health care system and the value of emergency medicine.美国医疗保健系统的变化格局与急诊医学的价值。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;19(10):1204-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.1446.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
5
Analysis & commentary. The foundation that health reform lays for improved payment, care coordination, and prevention.分析与评论。医改为改善支付、医疗协调和预防奠定的基础。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1183-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0415.
6
Quality and safety in medical care: what does the future hold?医疗保健的质量和安全:未来如何?
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Nov;135(11):1425-31. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0154-OA.
7
Bundled payments for care improvement initiative: the next evolution of payment formulations: AAHKS Bundled Payment Task Force.打包支付改善护理计划:支付方式的下一个发展阶段:AAHKS 打包支付工作组。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.012.
8
Moving (realistically) from volume-based to value-based health care payment in the USA: starting with medicare payment policy.在美国,从基于量的医疗保健支付方式(现实地)向基于价值的医疗保健支付方式转变:从医疗保险支付政策开始。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Oct;16(4):249-51. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010151. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
9
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010: reforming the health care reform for the new decade.2010 年患者保护与平价医疗法案:为新十年改革医疗改革。
Pain Physician. 2011 Jan-Feb;14(1):E35-67.
10
Changes in the Medicare home health care market: the impact of reimbursement policy.医疗保险家庭医疗保健市场的变化:报销政策的影响。
Med Care. 2009 Mar;47(3):302-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818afbf9.

引用本文的文献

1
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Value Pathways: Opportunities for Emergency Clinicians to Turn Policy Into Practice.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心基于绩效的激励支付系统价值路径:急诊临床医生将政策转化为实践的机会。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;78(5):599-603. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
2
Implementing Data Definition Consistency for Emergency Department Operations Benchmarking and Research.为急诊科运营基准测试和研究实现数据定义一致性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;23(7):796-802. doi: 10.1111/acem.12988. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
3
Pre-emergency-department care-seeking patterns are associated with the severity of presenting condition for emergency department visit and subsequent adverse events: a timeframe episode analysis.
急诊就诊前的就医模式与急诊科就诊时的病情严重程度及随后的不良事件相关:一项时间框架事件分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0127793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127793. eCollection 2015.
4
Factors associated with the disposition of severely injured patients initially seen at non–trauma center emergency departments: disparities by insurance status.与最初在非创伤中心急诊部就诊的严重创伤患者处置相关的因素:保险状况的差异。
JAMA Surg. 2014 May;149(5):422-30. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4398.