Office of Data Integration and Food Protection (ODIFP), Food Safety and Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, District of Columbia 20250, USA.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):534-41. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318211b47b.
In Maryland, county Food Protection Programs (FPP), housed within Environmental Public Health (EPH) Divisions, maintain responsibility for regular inspection of all food service facilities (FSF). With growing concerns about how our food supply is protected, it is important to determine the state and effectiveness of our food safety systems. This research elucidates the roles, responsibilities, strengths, and weaknesses of Food Safety and Protection Programs in Maryland.
A 16-question survey tool, which addressed facets of the local food protection infrastructure, including FSF inspections, staffing, budget, and foodborne illness surveillance, was distributed to all 24 county FPP.
The number of FSF in Maryland increased 97% from 2001 to 2006 and counties had an average inspection completion rate of 73%, with a 4% increase over the time period. Statewide, there were 4.1 EPH full-time employees (FTE) per 10 000 population and 1.6 FPP FTE per 10 000 population. EPH Division budgets increased 63% statewide, from $19.5 million in 2000 to $31.9 million in 2007. FPP budgets also increased 59% over the period, from $6.2 million in 2000 to $9.8 million in 2007.
This study offers new quantitative measures of the demands, capacities, and performance of Food Protection and Safety Programs in Maryland. This assessment of local EPH and FPP capacity also offers insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the local food protection and safety infrastructure. Importantly, it reveals an infrastructure and dedicated food protection workforce that inspects the food supply and responds to foodborne illness outbreaks. Yet, resources vary substantially from county to county, impacting which services can be provided and how well they can be performed. This can, in turn, impact the potential risk of foodborne illness and the public's overall health.
马里兰州的县食品保护计划(FPP)设在环境公共卫生(EPH)部门内,负责定期检查所有食品服务设施(FSF)。由于人们越来越关注我们的食品供应如何得到保护,因此确定我们的食品安全系统的状况和有效性非常重要。本研究阐明了马里兰州食品安全和保护计划的作用、责任、优势和劣势。
一项 16 个问题的调查工具,涉及当地食品保护基础设施的各个方面,包括 FSF 检查、人员配备、预算和食源性疾病监测,分发给所有 24 个县的 FPP。
马里兰州的 FSF 数量从 2001 年到 2006 年增加了 97%,各县的检查完成率平均为 73%,在此期间增长了 4%。全州范围内,每 10000 人口有 4.1 名 EPH 全职员工(FTE),每 10000 人口有 1.6 名 FPP FTE。EPH 司预算在全州范围内增加了 63%,从 2000 年的 1950 万美元增加到 2007 年的 3190 万美元。同期,FPP 预算也增长了 59%,从 2000 年的 620 万美元增加到 2007 年的 980 万美元。
本研究提供了马里兰州食品保护和安全计划的需求、能力和绩效的新定量衡量标准。对当地 EPH 和 FPP 能力的评估还提供了对当地食品保护和安全基础设施的优势和劣势的深入了解。重要的是,它揭示了一个检查食品供应并应对食源性疾病爆发的基础设施和专门的食品保护劳动力。然而,资源在各县之间差异很大,影响了可以提供哪些服务以及可以提供服务的程度。这反过来又会影响食源性疾病的潜在风险和公众的整体健康。