• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助直肠切除术治疗炎症性肠病:腹腔镜与机器人技术的病例匹配比较。

Robotic-assisted proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: a case-matched comparison of laparoscopic and robotic technique.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center and The University of Chicago Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5095, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Mar;16(3):587-94. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1692-6. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-011-1692-6
PMID:21964583
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic proctectomy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

This is an IRB-approved case-matched review. Seventeen robotic proctectomies (RP), 10 with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) and 7 completion (CP), were matched to laparoscopic proctectomies (LP). Short-term and functional outcomes were compared between LP and RP.

RESULTS

In CP cohort, operative times were longer in the RP group (351 RP vs 238 LP min, p = 0.03), mean robotic time 90 min. Estimated blood loss (EBL) was similar between RP-CP and LP-CP groups (p = 0.18). Return of bowel function (RBF) was slower in RP-CP group (3.0 vs 1.7 days, p = 0.04), and length of stay (LOS) was longer (6.4 vs 4.1 days, p = 0.02). In the IPAA group, there were no differences between operative times (p = 0.14), robotic time 86 min; EBL (p = 0.15), and postoperative complications. Return of bowel function (3.6 vs 2.6 days, p = 0.3) and LOS (8.5 vs 6.1 days, p = 0.17) were similar between RP and LP. Bowel and sexual function were equivalent between LP and RP-IPAA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic proctectomy is a safe and effective technique for patients with IBD. It is comparable to LP with regard to perioperative outcomes, complications, and short-term functional results.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的短期疗效。

方法

这是一项经过 IRB 批准的病例匹配回顾性研究。共纳入 17 例行机器人直肠切除术(RP)的患者,其中 10 例行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术(IPAA),7 例行完成式直肠切除术(CP),并与腹腔镜直肠切除术(LP)进行匹配。比较 LP 与 RP 的短期和功能结果。

结果

在 CP 组中,RP 组的手术时间更长(351 vs 238 min,p = 0.03),机器人操作时间为 90 min。RP-CP 组和 LP-CP 组的估计失血量(EBL)相似(p = 0.18)。RP-CP 组的肠道功能恢复(RBF)较慢(3.0 天 vs 1.7 天,p = 0.04),住院时间(LOS)较长(6.4 天 vs 4.1 天,p = 0.02)。在 IPAA 组中,手术时间无差异(p = 0.14),机器人操作时间为 86 min;EBL 无差异(p = 0.15),术后并发症也无差异。RBF(3.6 天 vs 2.6 天,p = 0.3)和 LOS(8.5 天 vs 6.1 天,p = 0.17)在 RP 和 LP 之间相似。LP 和 RP-IPAA 组的肠道和性功能相似。

结论

机器人直肠切除术是治疗 IBD 患者的一种安全有效的技术。与 LP 相比,RP 在围手术期结局、并发症和短期功能结果方面相当。

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: a case-matched comparison of laparoscopic and robotic technique.机器人辅助直肠切除术治疗炎症性肠病:腹腔镜与机器人技术的病例匹配比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Mar;16(3):587-94. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1692-6. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
2
Combining staged laparoscopic colectomy with robotic completion proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in ulcerative colitis for improved clinical and cosmetic outcomes: a single-center feasibility study and technical description.分期腹腔镜结肠切除术联合机器人辅助完成经肛门直肠切除术和回肠贮袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)治疗溃疡性结肠炎以改善临床和美容效果:单中心可行性研究和技术描述。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):877-884. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01466-x. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
Case-matched Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Proctectomy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠切除术治疗炎症性肠病的病例匹配对照研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Jun;26(3):e37-40. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000269.
4
Characteristics of learning curve in minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in a single institution.单机构中微创回肠储袋肛管吻合术学习曲线的特点
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1083-1092. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5068-6. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
5
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术用于回肠J袋肛管吻合的保留肛门直肠切除术
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011 Jul;20(4):234-9. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2010.536355. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
6
Short-term outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery: a propensity score match study.机器人与腹腔镜回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 May 4;408(1):175. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02898-1.
7
Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes in 588 patients undergoing minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single-institution experience.588例接受微创回肠贮袋肛管吻合术患者的安全性、可行性及短期结局:单中心经验
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Jun;20(6):369-374. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1465-z. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
8
Laparoscopic versus open 2-stage ileal pouch: laparoscopic approach allows for faster restoration of intestinal continuity.腹腔镜与开腹 2 期回肠袋术:腹腔镜方法可更快恢复肠道连续性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Sep;211(3):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.05.018.
9
Staged restorative proctocolectomy: laparoscopic or open completion proctectomy after laparoscopic subtotal colectomy?分期式修复性直肠结肠切除术:腹腔镜次全结肠切除术后行腹腔镜或开放性完成直肠切除术?
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3294-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1707-0. Epub 2011 May 2.
10
Three-stage Laparoscopic Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Is the Best Approach for High-risk Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Analysis of 185 Consecutive Patients.三阶段腹腔镜回肠贮袋肛管吻合术是炎症性肠病高危患者的最佳治疗方法:185例连续患者分析
J Crohns Colitis. 2016 Aug;10(8):898-904. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw040. Epub 2016 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic or open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜或开放回肠储袋肛管吻合术的手术结果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 1;19(1):544. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02707-5.
2
Evolution of practice of robotic ileoanal pouches: a single-center case series in East London.机器人回肠储袋肛管吻合术的实践演变:东伦敦的单中心病例系列研究
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2025 Jun 15;28(2):97-102. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2025.28.2.97.
3
The outcomes of robotic ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Totally laparoscopic total proctocolectomy: a safe alternative to open surgery in inflammatory bowel disease.全腹腔镜全直肠结肠切除术:炎症性肠病中一种安全的开腹手术替代方案。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012 May;18(5):863-8. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21808. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
2
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术用于回肠J袋肛管吻合的保留肛门直肠切除术
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2011 Jul;20(4):234-9. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2010.536355. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
3
Urinary and sexual disorders after laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer in males.
克罗恩病中机器人回结肠切除术与腹腔镜手术和开放手术相比的结果:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Mar 26;29(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03116-4.
4
Robotic proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a hybrid approach.机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除回肠储袋肛管吻合术:一种混合手术方式。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Mar 12;40(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04854-5.
5
Robotic-assisted total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis: a step-by-step approach for surgeons advancing to expertise.家族性腺瘤性息肉病的机器人辅助全直肠结肠切除术加回肠储袋肛管吻合术:外科医生迈向专业水平的分步方法
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jan 24;29(1):56. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03107-x.
6
The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Trends and Future Directions.微创手术在炎症性肠病治疗中的作用:当前趋势与未来方向
Cureus. 2024 Jul 31;16(7):e65868. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65868. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Comparison of short-term outcomes and defecatory function following robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for stapled-ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术行吻合器回肠储袋肛管吻合术后短期结局及排便功能比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7112-7120. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001994.
8
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgical Techniques.微创外科治疗炎症性肠病:机器人与腹腔镜手术技术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Aug 14;18(8):1342-1355. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae037.
9
National trends and feasibility of a robotic surgical approach in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.国家趋势和机器人手术方法在炎症性肠病患者管理中的可行性。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7849-7858. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10333-1. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
10
Procedure-Specific Risks of Robotic Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Liver Metastases.机器人同时切除结直肠癌和同步肝转移的特定手术风险
Res Sq. 2023 May 16:rs.3.rs-2920026. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2920026/v1.
男性腹腔镜直肠全系膜切除术(TME)后的尿与性功能障碍。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Apr;15(4):637-43. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1459-0. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
4
Minimally invasive pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis: is there a benefit in staging?微创袋状手术治疗溃疡性结肠炎:分期有获益吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Mar;54(3):306-10. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820347b4.
5
A comparison of open and robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma.开腹与机器人全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠腺癌的比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Mar;54(3):275-82. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182060152.
6
Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study.机器人与腹腔镜直肠癌切除术:一项病例对照研究的短期结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Feb;54(2):151-6. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fec4fd.
7
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗低位直肠癌:短期结局的病例匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Dec;17(12):3195-202. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1162-5. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes.机器人与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:肿瘤安全性和短期结局的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2888-94. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1134-7. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
9
Emerging biologics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: what is around the corner?炎症性肠病治疗中的新兴生物制剂:有哪些新进展?
Curr Drug Targets. 2010 Feb;11(2):249-60. doi: 10.2174/138945010790309975.
10
Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer.机器人肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的多中心研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1614-20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0909-3. Epub 2010 Jan 20.