Dalla-Palma L, Pozzi-Mucelli R
Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
Clin Imaging. 1990 May;14(2):83-98. doi: 10.1016/0899-7071(90)90001-r.
The diagnosis of renal masses is based upon the contribution of ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT), which enable the recognition of these lesions with high diagnostic accuracy. However, a number of diagnostic difficulties exist in the definition of the nature of the mass, both for cystic and solid lesions, and to a lesser extent in the identification of the mass. "Complicated" cystic masses, such as calcified cysts, hemorrhagic cysts, inflammatory cysts, abscesses, and cystic tumors may be difficult to diagnose with US and sometimes with CT. CT is helpful in most of these cases because it enables the evaluation of the calcifications and the density of the fluid content. CT is also helpful in cases of cystic tumors because it shows the enhancement of septae within the masses. Problems with solid masses are the identification of small renal tumors and the definition of the benign or malignant nature of the mass. Although both techniques enable the recognition of most tumors, even if small in diameter, they are still limited in defining the pathological structure of the tumor.
肾肿块的诊断基于超声检查(US)和计算机断层扫描(CT)的作用,这两种检查能够以较高的诊断准确性识别这些病变。然而,在确定肿块的性质方面存在一些诊断困难,无论是囊性还是实性病变,在肿块的识别方面诊断困难相对较小。“复杂”的囊性肿块,如钙化囊肿、出血性囊肿、炎性囊肿、脓肿和囊性肿瘤,可能难以通过超声诊断,有时CT也难以诊断。在大多数这些情况下,CT是有帮助的,因为它能够评估钙化情况以及液体内容物的密度。CT在囊性肿瘤的诊断中也有帮助,因为它能显示肿块内间隔的强化。实性肿块的问题在于小肾肿瘤的识别以及肿块良性或恶性性质的确定。尽管这两种技术都能够识别大多数肿瘤,即使肿瘤直径较小,但在确定肿瘤的病理结构方面仍然存在局限性。