• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The views of patients and the general public about expensive anti-cancer drugs in the NHS: a questionnaire-based study.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中患者及公众对昂贵抗癌药物的看法:一项基于问卷调查的研究
JRSM Short Rep. 2011 Sep;2(9):69. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011050. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
2
Population-health impact of new drugs recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in England during 2000-20: a retrospective analysis.2000年至2020年期间英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所推荐的新药对人群健康的影响:一项回顾性分析
Lancet. 2025 Jan 4;405(10472):50-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02352-3. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
3
An investigation of West Sussex general dental practitioners' awareness, attitudes and adherence to NICE dental recall guidelines.对西苏塞克斯郡普通牙科医生对英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)牙科复诊指南的认知、态度及遵循情况的调查。
Prim Dent Care. 2012 Jan;19(1):11-22. doi: 10.1308/135576112798990755.
4
Ceftazidime with avibactam for treating severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections: technology evaluation to inform a novel subscription-style payment model.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗严重需氧革兰氏阴性细菌感染:技术评估以支持新型订阅式支付模式。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(73):1-230. doi: 10.3310/YAPL9347.
5
Cefiderocol for treating severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections: technology evaluation to inform a novel subscription-style payment model.头孢地尔罗治疗严重需氧革兰氏阴性细菌感染:技术评估以提供一种新的订阅式支付模式。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(28):1-238. doi: 10.3310/YGWR4511.
6
Assessment of Coverage in England of Cancer Drugs Qualifying for US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval.英格兰对有资格获得美国食品和药物管理局加速批准的癌症药物的覆盖范围评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Apr 1;181(4):490-498. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8441.
7
Modelling approaches for histology-independent cancer drugs to inform NICE appraisals: a systematic review and decision-framework.基于组织学的癌症药物建模方法,为 NICE 评估提供信息:系统评价和决策框架。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(76):1-228. doi: 10.3310/hta25760.
8
Deciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views.国民医疗服务体系资金的使用决策:公众与医学观点调查
Health Expect. 2002 Mar;5(1):47-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00157.x.
9
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.
10
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.仑伐替尼联合帕博利珠单抗治疗未经治疗的晚期肾细胞癌:系统评价和成本效果分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(49):1-190. doi: 10.3310/TRRM4238.

引用本文的文献

1
Should Patients Be Allowed to Pay Out of Pocket? The Ethical Dilemma of Access to Expensive Anti-cancer Treatments in Universal Healthcare Systems: A Dutch Case Study.应允许患者自掏腰包付费吗?全民医疗保健系统中获取昂贵抗癌治疗的伦理困境:一项荷兰案例研究。
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):771-784. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10342-2. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Current Attitudes toward Unfunded Cancer Therapies among Canadian Medical Oncologists.加拿大肿瘤医学专家对未资助癌症疗法的当前态度。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Nov 16;28(6):4748-4755. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060400.
3
Willingness to pay for a cure of low-risk melanoma patients in Germany.德国低危黑色素瘤患者对治愈的支付意愿。
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197780. eCollection 2018.
4
Stated and Revealed Preferences for Funding New High-Cost Cancer Drugs: A Critical Review of the Evidence from Patients, the Public and Payers.资助新型高成本抗癌药物的陈述性偏好与显示性偏好:对来自患者、公众和支付方证据的批判性综述
Patient. 2016 Jun;9(3):201-22. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0139-7.
5
Therapy preferences in melanoma treatment--willingness to pay and preference of quality versus length of life of patients, physicians and healthy controls.黑色素瘤治疗中的治疗偏好——患者、医生和健康对照者对支付意愿以及质量与生命长度的偏好
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 4;9(11):e111237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111237. eCollection 2014.
6
The value of progression-free survival to patients with advanced-stage cancer.晚期癌症患者无进展生存期的价值。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 18;9(1):41-7. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.156.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication about high-cost drugs in oncology--the patient view.肿瘤学中关于高成本药物的沟通——患者视角。
Ann Oncol. 2010 Sep;21(9):1910-1914. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq068. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
2
To tell or not to tell: the community wants to know about expensive anticancer drugs as a potential treatment option.告知还是不告知:公众希望了解昂贵的抗癌药物作为一种潜在治疗选择的情况。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 1;27(34):5830-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.7793. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
3
Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions.对信息的需求及参与治疗决策的情况:老年癌症患者的偏好及其医生的认知
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5275-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922.
4
Medical oncologists' views on communicating with patients about chemotherapy costs: a pilot survey.肿瘤内科医生关于与患者沟通化疗费用的观点:一项初步调查。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10;25(2):233-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2437.
5
Do oncologists discuss expensive anti-cancer drugs with their patients?肿瘤学家会与他们的患者讨论昂贵的抗癌药物吗?
Ann Oncol. 2006 Apr;17(4):702-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdj136. Epub 2006 Jan 17.

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中患者及公众对昂贵抗癌药物的看法:一项基于问卷调查的研究

The views of patients and the general public about expensive anti-cancer drugs in the NHS: a questionnaire-based study.

作者信息

Jenkins Valerie A, Trapala Ivonne Solis, Parlour Louise, Langridge Carolyn I, Fallowfield Lesley J

机构信息

Cancer Research UK Psychosocial Oncology Group, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex , UK.

出版信息

JRSM Short Rep. 2011 Sep;2(9):69. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011050. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1258/shorts.2011.011050
PMID:21969880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3184012/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the views of patients and members of the public about who should pay for expensive new cancer drugs not recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).

DESIGN

A study-specific questionnaire was used to elicit the views of patients and the general public between April and June 2010. It examined whether participants thought patients should be told about all possible cancer treatments, if the NHS should always fund non-NICE recommended drugs and attitudes towards self-funding/co-payments. The influence of sociodemographic factors on responses was also examined.

SETTING

Oncology clinics in Sussex and various locations including old persons' lunch clubs, parks, sports venues and support groups.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and 10 patients with common solid tumours, and 416 members of the general public

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Frequencies of responses to items regarding payments for expensive anti-cancer drugs stratified by sociodemographic factors and comparison of responses between patients and members of the public.

RESULTS

Most respondents (70% [147/210] of patients and 64% [266/416] of the general public) had heard of NICE. Both groups believed that doctors should tell patients about all available cancer treatments even if the NHS cannot pay (94%, 196/208; 93%, 388/415). However, only 49% (101/207) of patients and 36% (146/409) of the public believed that the NHS should always fund all new cancer drugs that have failed health technology assessments. Strong predictors of willingness to purchase expensive new cancer drugs included younger age (<45 years), sex (female) and higher educational level.

CONCLUSION

The general population appear realistic about the difficulties of providing funding for expensive new drugs. A communication skills training course has been developed to help clinicians with these difficult consultations.

摘要

目的

确定患者及公众对于应由谁来支付国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)未推荐的昂贵新型抗癌药物费用的看法。

设计

2010年4月至6月期间,使用一份针对该研究的问卷来收集患者及公众的看法。问卷调查了参与者是否认为应告知患者所有可能的癌症治疗方法、国民保健制度(NHS)是否应始终资助未获NICE推荐的药物,以及对自费/共同支付的态度。还研究了社会人口统计学因素对回答的影响。

地点

苏塞克斯郡的肿瘤诊所,以及包括老年人午餐俱乐部、公园、体育场馆和支持团体在内的多个场所。

参与者

210名患有常见实体瘤的患者和416名公众

主要观察指标

按社会人口统计学因素分层的关于昂贵抗癌药物支付项目的回答频率,以及患者与公众回答的比较。

结果

大多数受访者(患者中的70%[147/210]和公众中的64%[266/416])听说过NICE。两组都认为,即使NHS无法支付,医生也应告知患者所有可用的癌症治疗方法(94%,196/208;93%,388/415)。然而,只有49%(101/207)的患者和36%(146/409)的公众认为NHS应始终资助所有未通过卫生技术评估的新型癌症药物。购买昂贵新型抗癌药物意愿的有力预测因素包括年龄较小(<45岁)、性别(女性)和较高的教育水平。

结论

普通民众似乎对为昂贵新药提供资金的困难有现实的认识。已开发了一门沟通技巧培训课程,以帮助临床医生进行这些困难的会诊。