Taubert Mark, Nelson Annmarie
Marie Curie Centre Penarth and Palliative Care Department, Cardiff University, Velindre Hospital , Cardiff CF14 2TL , UK.
JRSM Short Rep. 2011 Sep;2(9):70. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011020. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
We aimed to establish how prepared GPs who work regular out-of-hours shifts feel when dealing with end-of-life issues in palliative care patients, what they thought about seeing such patients and whether they considered themselves emotionally equipped to do so.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs who worked regular out-of-hours shifts. A detailed analysis of transcripts using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was undertaken.
South Wales.
GPs employed by the local health board's out-of-hours service were contacted.
All interview data were analysed systematically and statements that reflected emotional impact and strain were highlighted, coded and interpreted within their context.
GPs expressed unease and used terms such as 'heartsink', when having to deal with palliative care issues out-of-hours. Heartsink in this context referred to the subjective experience of the clinician. Emotional 'housekeeping', i.e. looking after oneself after emotionally-charged encounters, was felt to be a very important process and GPs used a range of coping mechanisms, including reflective time, sharing with peers, compartmentalisation and personal empathy to deal with stress.
The emotional effects of palliative care encounters on out-of-hours GPs should not be underestimated. Our interpretation distinguished the term 'heartsink' from its usual context, the 'heartsink patient', to a different meaning, that of the imminent palliative care encounter triggering a sensation of heartsink for some out-of-hours doctors. Therefore, the term 'heartsink encounter', rather than heartsink patient, seemed more fitting. Pressed services may encourage a culture where discussion or debrief with a colleague after a palliative care encounter is not perceived as a practical option. This may contribute to work-related burnout in this group of doctors and out-of-hours collaboratives need to be aware of this issue, when planning their services.
我们旨在确定那些定期值非工作时间班的全科医生在处理姑息治疗患者的临终问题时的准备程度如何,他们对诊治此类患者的看法,以及他们是否认为自己在情感上有能力这样做。
对定期值非工作时间班的全科医生进行了半结构化访谈。采用解释现象学分析法对访谈记录进行了详细分析。
南威尔士。
联系了当地卫生委员会非工作时间服务所雇佣的全科医生。
对所有访谈数据进行系统分析,突出反映情感影响和压力的陈述,并在其背景下进行编码和解释。
全科医生在非工作时间处理姑息治疗问题时表示不安,并使用了“心情沉重”等表述。在此背景下,“心情沉重”指的是临床医生的主观感受。情感“整理”,即在经历情感冲击后照顾好自己,被认为是一个非常重要的过程,全科医生使用了一系列应对机制,包括反思时间、与同行交流、划分界限和个人同理心来应对压力。
不应低估姑息治疗接触对非工作时间全科医生的情感影响。我们的解释将“心情沉重”一词从其通常的背景“心情沉重的患者”中区分出来,赋予了不同的含义,即即将到来的姑息治疗接触会让一些非工作时间的医生产生心情沉重的感觉。因此,“心情沉重的接触”一词,而非“心情沉重的患者”,似乎更合适。服务紧张可能会助长一种文化,即姑息治疗接触后与同事讨论或汇报不被视为一种可行的选择。这可能会导致这群医生出现职业倦怠,非工作时间协作团队在规划服务时需要意识到这个问题。