Suppr超能文献

使用实验室信息系统驱动的工具进行随机细胞病理学报告的签出前质量保证。

Use of a laboratory information system driven tool for pre-signout quality assurance of random cytopathology reports.

作者信息

Kamat Sonal, Parwani Anil V, Khalbuss Walid E, Monaco Sara E, Kelly Susan M, Wiehagen Luke T, Piccoli Anthony L, Lassige Karen M, Pantanowitz Liron

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Shadyside Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Pathol Inform. 2011;2:42. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.84279. Epub 2011 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality assurance (QA) programs in cytopathology laboratories in the USA currently primarily involve the review of Pap tests per clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988 federal regulations. A pre-signout quality assurance tool (PQAT) at our institution allows the laboratory information system (LIS) to also automatically and randomly select an adjustable percentage of non-gynecological cytopathology cases for review before release of the final report. The aim of this study was to review our experience and the effectiveness of this novel PQAT tool in cytology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Software modifications in the existing LIS application (CoPathPlus, Cerner) allow for the random QA of 8% of cases prior to signout. Selected cases are assigned to a second QA cytopathologist for review and all agreement and disagreements tracked. Detected errors are rectified before the case is signed out. Data from cases selected for PQAT over an 18-month period were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The total number of non-gynecological cases selected for QA review was 1339 (7.45%) out of 17,967 cases signed out during this time period. Most (1304) cases (97.4%) had an agreement in diagnosis. In 2.6% of cases, there were disagreements, including 34 minor and only 1 major disagreement. Average turnaround time of cases selected for review was not significantly altered.

CONCLUSION

The PQAT provides a prospective QA mechanism in non-gynecological cytopathology to prevent diagnostic errors from occurring. This LIS-driven tool allows for peer review and corrective action to be taken prior to reporting without delaying turnaround time, thereby improving patient safety.

摘要

背景

美国细胞病理学实验室的质量保证(QA)计划目前主要涉及根据1988年联邦法规的《临床实验室改进修正案》对巴氏试验进行审查。我们机构的一种签出前质量保证工具(PQAT)允许实验室信息系统(LIS)在最终报告发布前自动随机选择一定比例可调整的非妇科细胞病理学病例进行审查。本研究的目的是回顾我们在细胞学方面使用这种新型PQAT工具的经验及其有效性。

材料与方法

对现有LIS应用程序(CoPathPlus,Cerner)进行软件修改,以便在签出前对8%的病例进行随机质量保证审查。选定的病例被分配给另一位质量保证细胞病理学家进行审查,并跟踪所有的一致和不一致情况。在病例签出前纠正检测到的错误。收集并分析了在18个月期间选择进行PQAT审查的病例数据。

结果

在此期间签出的17967例病例中,选择进行质量保证审查的非妇科病例总数为1339例(7.45%)。大多数(1304例,97.4%)病例诊断一致。在2.6%的病例中存在分歧,包括34例小分歧和仅1例大分歧。选择进行审查的病例的平均周转时间没有显著改变。

结论

PQAT为非妇科细胞病理学提供了一种前瞻性质量保证机制,以防止诊断错误的发生。这种由LIS驱动的工具允许在报告前进行同行评审并采取纠正措施,而不会延迟周转时间,从而提高患者安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58df/3169920/4f7e32348932/JPI-2-42-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
The value of monitoring amended reports in cytopathology quality programs: A biennial review.
Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Nov;130(11):860-871. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22607. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
3
Quality metrics in non-gynecologic cytology: results from the 2022 American Society of Cytopathology survey.
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2023 Jul-Aug;12(4):258-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
4
The role of peer review in internal quality assurance in cytopathology.
Pathology. 1998 Aug;30(3):309-13. doi: 10.1080/00313029800169506.
9
The complementary nature of peer review and quality assurance data collection.
Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):221-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132931. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

本文引用的文献

4
Informatics tools for quality in anatomic pathology.
Clin Lab Med. 2008 Jun;28(2):207-22, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2007.12.003.
5
Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 May;32(5):732-7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31815a04f5.
6
Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Nov;30(11):1469-71. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213303.13435.27.
7
Improving patient safety through quality assurance.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 May;130(5):633-7. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-633-IPSTQA.
9
Defining error in anatomic pathology.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 May;130(5):604-6. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-604-DEIAP.
10
Double slide viewing as a cytology quality improvement initiative.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Apr;125(4):526-33. doi: 10.1309/TKNM-9GRG-PL2J-T95Y.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验