Layfield Lester J, Morton M J, Cramer Harvey M, Hirschowitz Sharon
Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2009 Oct;37(10):710-4. doi: 10.1002/dc.21093.
National Cancer Institute State of the Science Conference on thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) summarized diagnostic terminology. Six diagnostic categories were proposed including "follicular lesion of undetermined significance" (FLUS). FLUS was defined as findings neither convincingly benign nor sufficiently atypical for a diagnosis of "follicular neoplasm" or "suspicious for malignancy." It was proposed that this category represent less than 7% of thyroid FNAs. A search of the cytology records at three University Hospitals was performed for the term FLUS or older equivalent terms. Usage of FLUS was compared between institutions and among pathologists. Surgical pathology outcome for FLUS cases was determined. Twenty-eight pathologists evaluated 6,872 cases at the three institutions. Use of FLUS varied among pathologists (2.5 to 28.6%). Frequency of use of FLUS among institutions varied from 3.3 to 14.9%. FLUS cases [127 of 673 (18.9%)] underwent surgical exploration with malignancy identified in 36 cases (28.3%) undergoing resection. Use of FLUS varied substantially among pathologists and institutions. FLUS category requires more rigorously defined morphologic criteria for it to become a useful guide in clinical management.
美国国立癌症研究所甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)科学现状会议总结了诊断术语。会议提出了六个诊断类别,其中包括“意义未明的滤泡性病变”(FLUS)。FLUS被定义为既不能令人信服地诊断为良性,也不足以诊断为“滤泡性肿瘤”或“可疑恶性”的结果。有人提议,这一类别应占甲状腺FNA的比例不到7%。对三家大学医院的细胞学记录进行了检索,查找FLUS或更早的等效术语。比较了各机构之间以及病理学家之间FLUS的使用情况。确定了FLUS病例的手术病理结果。28名病理学家对这三家机构的6872例病例进行了评估。病理学家对FLUS的使用情况各不相同(2.5%至28.6%)。各机构中FLUS的使用频率从3.3%到14.9%不等。673例FLUS病例中有127例(18.9%)接受了手术探查,36例(28.3%)接受切除的病例中发现了恶性肿瘤。病理学家和机构对FLUS的使用差异很大。FLUS类别需要更严格定义的形态学标准,以便在临床管理中成为有用的指导。