• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培美曲塞引入的预算影响分析:泰国一家教学医院视角的案例研究

Budget impact analysis of pemetrexed introduction: case study from a teaching hospital perspective, Thailand.

作者信息

Chanjaruporn Farsai, Roughead Elizabeth E, Sooksriwong Cha-oncin, Kaojarern Sming

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Sep;94(9):1026-34.

PMID:21970190
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Thailand does not currently require Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) assessment. The present study aimed to estimate the annual drug cost and the incremental impact on the hospital pharmaceutical budget of the introduction of pemetrexed to a Thai teaching hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The budget impact model was conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for preparing submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). The model variables consisted of number of patients, growth rate of lung cancer, uptake rate of pemetrexed over time, unit prices of drugs, and the length and cost of treatment. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine changes in budgetary impact due to variation of parameters or assumptions in the model.

RESULTS

The introduction of pemetrexed was estimated to cause considerable costs for the teaching hospital. In the base-case analysis, the incremental costs were estimated at 8,553,984 Baht in the first year increasing to 12, 118, 144 Baht, 17,820,800 Baht and 17,820,800 Baht in the following years. The 4-year net budgetary impact was 20,154,480 Baht or approximately 127,560 Baht per patient. Sensitivity analyses found that number of treatment cycles andproportion of patients assumed to be treated with pemetrexed were the two most important influencing factors in the model.

CONCLUSION

New costly innovative interventions should be evaluated using the BIA model to determine whether they are affordable. The Thai government should consider requiring the BIA study as one of the requirements for drug submission to assist in the determination of listing and subsidizing decision for medicines.

摘要

目的

泰国目前不要求进行预算影响分析(BIA)评估。本研究旨在估计培美曲塞引入泰国一家教学医院后的年度药品成本以及对医院药品预算的增量影响。

材料与方法

预算影响模型是根据向药品福利咨询委员会(PBAC)提交申请的指南进行构建的。模型变量包括患者数量、肺癌增长率、培美曲塞随时间的采用率、药品单价以及治疗时长和成本。进行敏感性分析以确定由于模型参数或假设的变化而导致的预算影响变化。

结果

预计培美曲塞的引入会给教学医院带来相当大的成本。在基础案例分析中,第一年的增量成本估计为8,553,984泰铢,随后几年分别增至12,118,144泰铢、17,820,800泰铢和17,820,800泰铢。四年的净预算影响为20,154,480泰铢,即每位患者约127,560泰铢。敏感性分析发现,治疗周期数和假设接受培美曲塞治疗的患者比例是模型中两个最重要的影响因素。

结论

应使用BIA模型评估新的昂贵创新干预措施,以确定它们是否负担得起。泰国政府应考虑要求将BIA研究作为药品申报的要求之一,以协助确定药品的上市和补贴决策。

相似文献

1
Budget impact analysis of pemetrexed introduction: case study from a teaching hospital perspective, Thailand.培美曲塞引入的预算影响分析:泰国一家教学医院视角的案例研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Sep;94(9):1026-34.
2
Cost-utility and budget impact analyses of gefitinib in second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer from Thai payer perspective.从泰国医保支付方角度对吉非替尼用于晚期非小细胞肺癌二线治疗的成本效用和预算影响分析。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar;8(1):53-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2012.01528.x.
3
Cost-effectiveness of maintenance pemetrexed in patients with advanced nonsquamous-cell lung cancer from the perspective of the Swiss health care system.从瑞士医疗保健系统的角度来看,晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者维持培美曲塞的成本效益。
Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.08.1737. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
4
Budget impact of erlotinib for maintenance therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.厄洛替尼用于晚期非小细胞肺癌维持治疗的预算影响。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(2):159-66. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.557457. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
5
Cost-minimisation analysis of erlotinib in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a Brazilian perspective.厄洛替尼用于非小细胞肺癌二线治疗的成本最小化分析:巴西视角
J Med Econ. 2008;11(3):383-96. doi: 10.3111/13696990802208186.
6
The mounting medical care cost for adult AIDS patients at the Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital: consideration for management.诗里拉吉医院医学院成年艾滋病患者不断攀升的医疗费用:管理考量
J Med Assoc Thai. 1997 Jul;80(7):431-9.
7
Costs of payment in Thai acute coronary syndrome patients.泰国急性冠状动脉综合征患者的支付费用。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Oct;90 Suppl 1:21-31.
8
Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.预算影响分析——良好实践原则:ISPOR 2012 预算影响分析良好实践 II 工作组报告。
Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
9
Pemetrexed disodium for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.培美曲塞二钠治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jan;11(1):1-90. doi: 10.3310/hta11010.
10
Pemetrexed monotherapy versus pemetrexed plus platinum combination as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.培美曲塞单药治疗对比培美曲塞联合铂类药物作为二线治疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Oct 20;122(20):2472-6.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of the budget impact analyses for antitumor drugs of lung cancer.肺癌抗肿瘤药物预算影响分析的系统评价
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Dec 1;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00253-5.
2
"Budget impact analyses": a practical policy making tool for drug reimbursement decisions.“预算影响分析”:药物报销决策的实用政策制定工具。
Iran J Pharm Res. 2014 Summer;13(3):1105-9.