Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, USA.
Endoscopy. 2011 Dec;43(12):1045-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256894. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
Colonoscopy is widely used to detect and remove precancerous polyps, but fails to detect some polyps. Recent studies evaluating different image-enhanced methods have revealed conflicting results. The efficacy of colonoscopy imaging with simultaneous use of commercially available improvements, including high definition narrow band imaging (HD-NBI), and monochromatic charge-coupled device (CCD) video, was compared with a widely used standard definition white light (SDWL) colonoscopy system for detecting colorectal polyps. The primary aim was to determine whether the combination of image-enhanced colonoscopy systems resulted in fewer missed polyps compared with conventional colonoscopy.
In a randomized controlled trial (Clinicaltrials.gov. study number NCT00825292) patients having routine screening and surveillance underwent tandem colonoscopies with SDWL and image-enhanced (HD-NBI) colonoscopy. The main outcome measurement was the per-polyp false-negative ("miss") rate. Secondary outcomes were adenoma miss rate, and per-patient polyp and adenoma miss rates.
100 patients were randomized and 96 were included in the analysis. In total, 177 polyps were detected; of these, 72 (41 %) were adenomatous. Polyp and adenoma miss rates for SDWL colonoscopy were 57 % (60/105) and 49 % (19/39); those for image-enhanced colonoscopy were 31 % (22/72) and 27 % (9/33) (P = 0.005 and P = 0.036 for polyps and adenomas, respectively). Image-enhanced and SDWL approaches had similar per-patient miss rates for polyps (6/35 vs. 9/32, P = 0.27) and adenomas (4/22 vs. 8/20, P = 0.11).
Utilization of multiple recent improvements in image-enhanced colonoscopy was associated with a reduced miss rate for all polyps and for adenomatous polyps. It is not known which individual feature or combination of image-enhancement features led to the improvement.
结肠镜检查广泛用于检测和切除癌前息肉,但仍存在一些漏检的情况。近期研究评估了不同的图像增强方法,结果存在差异。本研究旨在对比使用和不使用商业化的图像增强技术(包括高清窄带成像[HD-NBI]和单色电荷耦合器件[CCD]视频)的结肠镜检查对结直肠息肉的检测效果,评估这些技术联合使用是否可以减少漏诊的息肉。
本研究为随机对照试验(Clinicaltrials.gov 注册号:NCT00825292),纳入行常规筛查和监测的患者,对其进行标准白光结肠镜(SDWL)和增强图像(HD-NBI)结肠镜检查。主要终点为每例息肉的假阴性(“漏诊”)率。次要终点为腺瘤漏诊率、每位患者的息肉和腺瘤漏诊率。
共 100 例患者随机分组,96 例患者纳入分析。共检出 177 个息肉,其中 72 个(41%)为腺瘤性息肉。SDWL 结肠镜检查的息肉和腺瘤漏诊率分别为 57%(60/105)和 49%(19/39);增强图像结肠镜检查的息肉和腺瘤漏诊率分别为 31%(22/72)和 27%(9/33)(P = 0.005 和 P = 0.036)。增强图像和 SDWL 方法检测息肉的患者漏诊率分别为 6/35 和 9/32(P = 0.27),检测腺瘤的患者漏诊率分别为 4/22 和 8/20(P = 0.11)。
多种最新的图像增强技术联合应用可降低所有息肉和腺瘤性息肉的漏诊率。但目前尚不清楚是哪种单独的特征或图像增强特征的组合导致了这种改善。