Hancock Kelli S, Mascarenhas Ranjan, Lieberman David
Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, 7901 Metropolis Drive, Austin, TX, 78744, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland VA Medical Center, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd., P3-GI, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 Jun;18(6):27. doi: 10.1007/s11894-016-0500-6.
In the USA, colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer death among both men and women. Declining rates of colon cancer in the past decade have been attributed in part to screening and removal of precancerous polyps via colonoscopy. Recent emphasis has been placed on measures to increase the quality and effectiveness of colonoscopy. These have been divided into pre-procedure quality metrics (bowel preparation), procedural quality metrics (cecal intubation, withdrawal time, and adenoma detection rate), post-procedure metrics (surveillance interval), and other quality metrics (patient satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure). The purpose of this article is to review the data and controversies surrounding each of these and identify ways to optimize the performance of colonoscopy.
在美国,结直肠癌是第三大常见癌症,也是男性和女性癌症死亡的第三大主要原因。过去十年中结肠癌发病率的下降部分归因于通过结肠镜检查筛查和切除癌前息肉。最近人们将重点放在提高结肠镜检查质量和有效性的措施上。这些措施分为术前质量指标(肠道准备)、术中质量指标(盲肠插管、退镜时间和腺瘤检出率)、术后指标(监测间隔)以及其他质量指标(患者满意度和愿意重复该检查的程度)。本文的目的是回顾围绕这些指标的相关数据和争议,并确定优化结肠镜检查性能的方法。