• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期癌症患者预后列线图的开发和验证。

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for terminally ill cancer patients.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana, Madrid 261-28046, Spain.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Nov 2;103(21):1613-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr388. Epub 2011 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djr388
PMID:21972226
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Determining life expectancy in terminally ill cancer patients is a difficult task. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the length of survival in patients with terminal disease.

METHODS

From February 1, 2003, to December 31, 2005, 406 consecutive terminally ill patients were entered into the study. We analyzed 38 features prognostic of life expectancy among terminally ill patients by multivariable Cox regression and identified the most accurate and parsimonious model by backward variable elimination according to the Akaike information criterion. Five clinical and laboratory variables were built into a nomogram to estimate the probability of patient survival at 15, 30, and 60 days. We validated and calibrated the nomogram with an external validation cohort of 474 patients who were treated from June 1, 2006, through December 31, 2007.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 29.1 days for the training set and 18.3 days for the validation set. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, lactate dehydrogenase levels, lymphocyte levels, albumin levels, and time from initial diagnosis to diagnosis of terminal disease were retained in the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model as independent prognostic factors of survival and formed the basis of the nomogram. The nomogram had high predictive performance, with a bootstrapped corrected concordance index of 0.70, and it showed good calibration. External independent validation revealed 68% predictive accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a highly accurate tool that uses basic clinical and analytical information to predict the probability of survival at 15, 30, and 60 days in terminally ill cancer patients. This tool can help physicians making decisions on clinical care at the end of life.

摘要

背景

确定终末期癌症患者的预期寿命是一项艰巨的任务。我们旨在开发和验证一种列线图,以预测终末期疾病患者的生存时间。

方法

从 2003 年 2 月 1 日至 2005 年 12 月 31 日,连续纳入 406 例终末期患者进行研究。我们通过多变量 Cox 回归分析了 38 个与终末期患者预期寿命相关的特征,并根据赤池信息量准则通过向后变量消除法确定了最准确和简约的模型。将 5 个临床和实验室变量构建到一个列线图中,以估计患者在 15、30 和 60 天时的生存概率。我们使用 2006 年 6 月 1 日至 2007 年 12 月 31 日期间治疗的 474 例患者的外部验证队列验证和校准了该列线图。

结果

训练组的中位总生存期为 29.1 天,验证组为 18.3 天。东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态、乳酸脱氢酶水平、淋巴细胞水平、白蛋白水平以及从初始诊断到终末期疾病的诊断时间是生存的独立预后因素,保留在多变量 Cox 比例风险模型中,并构成了该列线图的基础。该列线图具有较高的预测性能,经 bootstrap 校正的一致性指数为 0.70,并且具有良好的校准度。外部独立验证显示预测准确率为 68%。

结论

我们开发了一种高度准确的工具,该工具使用基本的临床和分析信息来预测终末期癌症患者在 15、30 和 60 天时的生存概率。该工具可以帮助医生在生命末期做出临床决策。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for terminally ill cancer patients.终末期癌症患者预后列线图的开发和验证。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Nov 2;103(21):1613-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr388. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
2
Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting disease specific survival after nephrectomy for papillary renal cell carcinoma.建立并验证用于预测肾乳头状细胞癌患者肾切除术后疾病特异性生存的列线图。
J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.026. Epub 2010 May 15.
3
Preoperative prognostic nomogram (probability table) for renal cell carcinoma based on TNM classification.基于TNM分类的肾细胞癌术前预后列线图(概率表)。
J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):480-5; discussion 485. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.017. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
4
Prognostic nomogram for disease-free survival in patients with renal adenocarcinoma.肾腺癌患者无病生存的预后列线图
Urol Int. 2012;88(3):271-6. doi: 10.1159/000336139. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
5
Highly predictive survival nomogram after upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.上尿路尿路上皮癌高预测生存率列线图。
Cancer. 2010 Aug 15;116(16):3774-84. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25122.
6
Development of a predicting tool for survival of terminally ill cancer patients.开发一种预测终末期癌症患者生存情况的工具。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 May;40(5):442-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyp182. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
7
Validation and adaptation of a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma using a three-grade system.使用三级系统对预测肢体软组织肉瘤患者生存率的列线图进行验证和调整。
Cancer. 2005 Jan 15;103(2):402-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20778.
8
Multicentre validation of a prognostic index for overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.多中心验证慢性淋巴细胞白血病总生存预后指数。
Hematol Oncol. 2011 Jun;29(2):91-9. doi: 10.1002/hon.959. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
9
Development and validation of a prognostic scale for use in patients with advanced cancer.一种用于晚期癌症患者的预后量表的开发与验证
Palliat Med. 2008 Sep;22(6):711-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216308095200.
10
A nomogram for predicting disease-specific survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer.预测转移性结直肠癌肝切除术后疾病特异性生存的列线图。
Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):282-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815ed67b.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the prognostic model "oncologiq palliative" for head and neck cancer patients.头颈部癌症患者“oncologiq姑息治疗”预后模型的验证
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May 24. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09462-1.
2
Aetiology and management of persistent withdrawal occlusion in venous ports in oncology patients.肿瘤患者静脉港持续性拔出阻塞的病因和处理。
Sci Prog. 2024 Jul-Sep;107(3):368504241260374. doi: 10.1177/00368504241260374.
3
Development and external validation of a predictive multivariable model for last-weeks survival of advanced cancer patients in the palliative home care setting (PACS).
开发并验证预测晚期癌症患者在姑息治疗居家环境下最后一周生存的多变量预测模型(PACS)。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Aug 25;31(9):536. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07990-2.
4
Factors Associated with In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Internal Medicine Patients with Nasogastric Tube Feeding.老年内科经鼻胃管喂养患者院内死亡的相关因素。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 May 9;18:729-735. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S408207. eCollection 2023.
5
To Treat or Not to Treat? Dilemmas when Deciding on Antineoplastic Treatment in Patients With Far Advanced Cancers.是否治疗?晚期癌症患者接受抗肿瘤治疗决策中的困境。
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231176639. doi: 10.1177/10732748231176639.
6
Accuracy of clinical predictions of prognosis at the end-of-life: evidence from routinely collected data in urgent care records.临终预后临床预测的准确性:来自紧急护理记录中常规收集数据的证据。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Apr 26;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01155-y.
7
Prognostic evaluation in patients with advanced cancer in the last months of life: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline.晚期癌症患者生命最后数月的预后评估:ESMO 临床实践指南。
ESMO Open. 2023 Apr;8(2):101195. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101195. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
8
Shock Index Is a Validated Prediction Tool for the Short-Term Survival of Advanced Cancer Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.休克指数是预测急诊科晚期癌症患者短期生存的有效工具。
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 10;12(6):954. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060954.
9
Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio and Development of a Nomogram in Breast Cancer Patients.乳腺癌患者治疗前淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值的预后价值及列线图的构建
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 17;11:650980. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.650980. eCollection 2021.
10
CDKN1C as a prognostic biomarker correlated with immune infiltrates and therapeutic responses in breast cancer patients.CDKN1C 作为一种与乳腺癌患者免疫浸润和治疗反应相关的预后生物标志物。
J Cell Mol Med. 2021 Oct;25(19):9390-9401. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16880. Epub 2021 Aug 31.