Idhesa, Technopôle de Brest Iroise, BP 52, 120 avenue de Rochon, Plouzané 29280, France.
J Water Health. 2011 Sep;9(3):467-82. doi: 10.2166/wh.2011.189.
The present study sought to identify Escherichia coli sources in a small catchment and to use the agro-hydrological model soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to estimate their impact on river water quality. The innovative aspects of this research are to assess the hourly variations of fecal contamination and to take these variations into account in the model to provide a better evaluation of river quality. Thus, water samples were taken weekly at the river outlet (n = 4) and 24-h monitoring sessions were performed during low and high-flow periods (n = 74). E. coli variations were found to be primarily linked to rainfall and not to resuspension mechanisms. Subdaily fluctuations and deviations were ±0.33 log(10) cfu/100 mL and ±0.70 log(10) cfu/100 mL for dry (<3 mm/day) and wet (>3 mm/day) weather, respectively. After river flow calibration, all known pollution sources (septic systems, manure spreading, farm discharges) were introduced into SWAT. The model reproduced the fecal contamination in the river and the use of subdaily deviations allowed us to evaluate the simulation quality and compare grab samplings with simulated daily E. coli concentration, thus confirming that the performance of the model is better when additional information on hourly concentration variations is used.
本研究旨在确定小流域中的大肠杆菌来源,并利用农业水文学模型土壤和水评估工具 (SWAT) 来估计它们对河水水质的影响。本研究的创新之处在于评估粪便污染的每小时变化,并在模型中考虑这些变化,以更好地评估河流水质。因此,每周在河流出口处采集水样(n = 4),并在低流量和高流量期间进行 24 小时监测(n = 74)。发现大肠杆菌的变化主要与降雨量有关,而与再悬浮机制无关。在晴天(<3 毫米/天)和雨天(>3 毫米/天),每日波动和偏差分别为±0.33 log(10) cfu/100 毫升和±0.70 log(10) cfu/100 毫升。在对河流流量进行校准后,所有已知的污染源(化粪池系统、粪便散布、农场排放)都被引入到 SWAT 中。该模型再现了河流中的粪便污染,每日波动的使用使我们能够评估模拟质量,并将每日 E. coli 浓度的实地采样与模拟值进行比较,从而证实当使用每小时浓度变化的额外信息时,模型的性能更好。