The Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Dec;33(12):2843-55. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21405. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
Despite intensive study, the role of the dorsal medial frontal cortex (dMFC) in error monitoring and conflict processing remains actively debated. The current experiment manipulated conflict type (stimulus conflict only or stimulus and response selection conflict) and utilized a novel modeling approach to isolate error and conflict variance during a multimodal numeric Stroop task. Specifically, hemodynamic response functions resulting from two statistical models that either included or isolated variance arising from relatively few error trials were directly contrasted. Twenty-four participants completed the task while undergoing event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging on a 1.5-Tesla scanner. Response times monotonically increased based on the presence of pure stimulus or stimulus and response selection conflict. Functional results indicated that dMFC activity was present during trials requiring response selection and inhibition of competing motor responses, but absent during trials involving pure stimulus conflict. A comparison of the different statistical models suggested that relatively few error trials contributed to a disproportionate amount of variance (i.e., activity) throughout the dMFC, but particularly within the rostral anterior cingulate gyrus (rACC). Finally, functional connectivity analyses indicated that an empirically derived seed in the dorsal ACC/pre-SMA exhibited strong connectivity (i.e., positive correlation) with prefrontal and inferior parietal cortex but was anti-correlated with the default-mode network. An empirically derived seed from the rACC exhibited the opposite pattern, suggesting that sub-regions of the dMFC exhibit different connectivity patterns with other large scale networks implicated in internal mentations such as daydreaming (default-mode) versus the execution of top-down attentional control (fronto-parietal).
尽管进行了深入研究,但背内侧额前皮质(dMFC)在错误监测和冲突处理中的作用仍存在争议。本实验操纵了冲突类型(仅刺激冲突或刺激和反应选择冲突),并利用一种新的建模方法在多模态数字 Stroop 任务中分离错误和冲突方差。具体来说,直接对比了两个统计模型的血流动力学响应函数,这两个模型要么包含要么隔离了相对较少错误试验引起的方差。24 名参与者在 1.5 特斯拉扫描仪上进行事件相关功能磁共振成像时完成了任务。反应时间根据纯刺激或刺激和反应选择冲突的存在而单调增加。功能结果表明,dMFC 活动存在于需要反应选择和抑制竞争运动反应的试验中,但在涉及纯刺激冲突的试验中不存在。对不同统计模型的比较表明,相对较少的错误试验对 dMFC 中的方差(即活动)有不成比例的贡献,但在额前扣带回(rACC)中尤其明显。最后,功能连接分析表明,背侧 ACC/pre-SMA 中的经验衍生种子与前额叶和下顶叶皮层表现出强烈的连接(即正相关),但与默认模式网络呈反相关。rACC 中的经验衍生种子表现出相反的模式,这表明 dMFC 的亚区与其他涉及内部思维(如白日梦(默认模式)与自上而下的注意力控制(额顶叶)的执行)的大规模网络表现出不同的连接模式。