Roberts Katherine L, Hall Deborah A
MRC Institute of Hearing Research, Nottingham, UK.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jun;20(6):1063-78. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20074.
Cognitive control over conflicting information has been studied extensively using tasks such as the color-word Stroop, flanker, and spatial conflict task. Neuroimaging studies typically identify a fronto-parietal network engaged in conflict processing, but numerous additional regions are also reported. Ascribing putative functional roles to these regions is problematic because some may have less to do with conflict processing per se, but could be engaged in specific processes related to the chosen stimulus modality, stimulus feature, or type of conflict task. In addition, some studies contrast activation on incongruent and congruent trials, even though a neutral baseline is needed to separate the effect of inhibition from that of facilitation. In the first part of this article, we report a systematic review of 34 neuroimaging publications, which reveals that conflict-related activity is reliably reported in the anterior cingulate cortex and bilaterally in the lateral prefrontal cortex, the anterior insula, and the parietal lobe. In the second part, we further explore these candidate "conflict" regions through a novel functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment, in which the same group of subjects perform related visual and auditory Stroop tasks. By carefully controlling for the same task (Stroop), the same to-be-ignored stimulus dimension (word meaning), and by separating out inhibitory processes from those of facilitation, we attempt to minimize the potential differences between the two tasks. The results provide converging evidence that the regions identified by the systematic review are reliably engaged in conflict processing. Despite carefully matching the Stroop tasks, some regions of differential activity remained, particularly in the parietal cortex. We discuss some of the task-specific processes which might account for this finding.
人们已经使用诸如颜色-文字斯特鲁普任务、侧翼任务和空间冲突任务等对冲突信息的认知控制进行了广泛研究。神经影像学研究通常会识别出一个参与冲突处理的额顶叶网络,但也有大量其他区域被报告。将假定的功能角色归因于这些区域存在问题,因为有些区域可能与冲突处理本身关系不大,而可能参与与所选刺激模态、刺激特征或冲突任务类型相关的特定过程。此外,一些研究对比了不一致试验和一致试验中的激活情况,尽管需要一个中性基线来区分抑制作用和促进作用带来的影响。在本文的第一部分,我们报告了对34篇神经影像学出版物的系统综述,结果显示,在前扣带回皮质以及双侧的外侧前额叶皮质、前岛叶和顶叶中,与冲突相关的活动得到了可靠的报告。在第二部分,我们通过一项新颖的功能磁共振成像实验进一步探索这些候选“冲突”区域,在该实验中,同一组受试者执行相关的视觉和听觉斯特鲁普任务。通过仔细控制相同的任务(斯特鲁普任务)、相同的要被忽略的刺激维度(词义),并将抑制过程与促进过程区分开来,我们试图尽量减少这两个任务之间的潜在差异。结果提供了趋同的证据,表明系统综述所确定的区域确实参与了冲突处理。尽管仔细匹配了斯特鲁普任务,但仍存在一些差异活动区域,尤其是在顶叶皮质。我们讨论了一些可能解释这一发现的特定任务过程。