Department of Radiology, Union Hospital Attached to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Br J Radiol. 2012 Jul;85(1015):972-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr/40850443. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate the correlation between CT angiographic clot load (CTACL) score, pulmonary perfusion defect (PPD) score and the global right ventricular function in the assessment of pulmonary embolism (PE) severity.
49 patients with acute PE, who underwent dual-source CT scan, were included in the study. CT angiography and perfusion imaging were performed. Data from electrocardiogram-gated coronary angiography scanning protocol were used for right ventricular function analysis. Two readers evaluated the CTACL and PPD scores using the Qanadli and Chae methods, respectively.
The PPD score had a strong positive correlation with the CTACL score (r=0.72, p<0.001) and both scores in turn had a strong positive correlation with the right ventricular/left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio (r=0.60, r=0.62, p<0.001). However, the PPD score had a strong negative correlation with ejection fraction (EF) (r=-0.63, p<0.001) while the CTACL score had a low negative correlation with EF (r=-0.33, p=0.02). Between the RV/LV<1 group (n=35) and the RV/LV >1 group (n=14), the PPD score, CTACL score, pulmonary artery trunk diameter, EF and reflux of inferior vena cava were significantly different, all with p<0.001. The end-systolic volume (p=0.01) was significantly different but the end-diastolic volume (p=0.11) and stroke volume (p=0.08) showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
Therefore, considering PPD scores, CTACL scores and cardiovascular manifestations together may be helpful in the evaluation of PE severity.
本研究旨在前瞻性探讨 CT 血管造影血栓负荷(CTACL)评分、肺灌注缺损(PPD)评分与整体右心室功能在评估肺栓塞(PE)严重程度中的相关性。
纳入 49 例接受双源 CT 扫描的急性 PE 患者,行 CT 血管造影和灌注成像检查。应用心电门控冠状动脉扫描方案数据进行右心室功能分析。两名读者分别采用 Qanadli 和 Chae 方法评估 CTACL 和 PPD 评分。
PPD 评分与 CTACL 评分呈强正相关(r=0.72,p<0.001),两者评分与右心室/左心室(RV/LV)直径比均呈强正相关(r=0.60,r=0.62,p<0.001)。然而,PPD 评分与射血分数(EF)呈强负相关(r=-0.63,p<0.001),而 CTACL 评分与 EF 呈低负相关(r=-0.33,p=0.02)。在 RV/LV<1 组(n=35)和 RV/LV >1 组(n=14)之间,PPD 评分、CTACL 评分、肺动脉主干直径、EF 和下腔静脉反流存在显著差异,均具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。两组间收缩末期容积(p=0.01)存在显著差异,但舒张末期容积(p=0.11)和每搏输出量(p=0.08)无统计学差异。
因此,综合考虑 PPD 评分、CTACL 评分和心血管表现可能有助于评估 PE 的严重程度。