Gavrilenko A V, Sandrikov V A, Ivanov V A, Piven' A V, Kuklin A V, Dutikova E F, Antonov G I, Miklashevich É R, Trunin I V, Abugov S A
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2011;17(2):70-4.
The work was aimed at comparatively studying the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting for optimal therapeutic decision-making in patients presenting with carotid artery stenoses. We examined and treated a total of one hundred and sixty-seven patients. In the group of endarterectomy, we performed a total of 91 operations in 85 patients, and in the group of carotid stenting, a total of 87 stenting procedures were carried out on the internal carotid artery with cerebral protection in 82 patients. This was followed by analysing both short- and long-term outcomes with a follow-up period ranging from 1 year to 3 years. We examined the following postoperative parameters: «stroke + lethality», incidence of transitory ischaemic attacks, as well as the rate of craniocerebral neuropathy and acute myocardial infarction. In the remote period we evaluated the prevalence rate of the parameter «stroke + myocardial infarction + lethality», as well as restenosis recurrence. In the carotid-endarterectomy group, the predictors of unfavourable surgical outcomes were contralateral occlusion (p=0.048) and cardial pathology (p=0.0245). In the group of carotid stenting, these predictors turned out to be a heterogeneous atherosclerotic plaque with an uneven or ulcerated contour (p=0.004), and the degree of cerebrovascular insufficiency (p=0.005).
